Cited by 31Education, Achievement, and GiftednessInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsPsychological and Educational Research Studies

Does choice matter or is it all about interest? An investigation using an experience sampling approach in high school science classrooms

Open access
Beymer, Patrick N., Rosenberg, Joshua M., Schmidt, Jennifer A.·2020·Learning and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101812

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beymer, P. N., Rosenberg, J. M., & Schmidt, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Corresponding author
Beymer, Patrick N.
Venue
Learning and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
78
Pages
101812
ISSN
1041-6080 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2999769621
Cited by
31
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Learning and Individual Differences (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
Keywords
student choice, interest, student engagement, affect, learning, student motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review