Cited by 1,393Management and Organizational StudiesInnovation and Knowledge ManagementTeam Dynamics and Performance

Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study

Cohen, Michael D., Bacdayan, Paul·1994·Organization Science

Abstract

Organizational routines—multi-actor, interlocking, reciprocally-triggered sequences of actions—are a major source of the reliability and speed of organizational performance. Without routines, organizations would lose efficiency as structures for collective action. But these frequently repeated action sequences can also occasionally give rise to serious suboptimality, hampering performance when they are automatically transferred onto inappropriate situations. While the knowledgeable design and redesign of routines presents a likely lever for those wishing to enhance organizational performance, the lever remains difficult to grasp because routines are hard to observe, analyze, and describe. This paper argues that new work in psychology on “procedural” memory may help explain how routines arise, stabilize and change. Procedural memory has close links to notions of individual skill and habit. It is memory for how things are done that is relatively automatic and inarticulate, and it encompasses both cognitive and motor activities. We report an experiment in which paired subjects developed interlocked task performance patterns that display the chief characteristics of organizational routines. We show evidence from their behavior supporting the claim that individuals store their components of organizational routines in procedural memory. If routines are stored as distributed procedural memories, this may be the source of distinctive properties reported by observers of organizational routines. The paper concludes with implications for both research and practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/orsc.5.4.554

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Procedural memory involves skills or routines and often represents tacit knowledge for individuals and organizations.

    “Thus, the procedural memory involves skills or routines, often represents tacit knowledge for individuals and organizations (Cohen & Bacdayan, 1994;Cohen, 1991;Nonaka, 1990;Winter, 1987).”

    From Linking knowledge management, organizational learning and memory (2020) · cites this paper as Cohen & Bacdayan, 1994

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohen, M. D., & Bacdayan, P.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Organization Science
Published
1994-11
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
554-568
ISSN
  • 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5455
OpenAlex
W2129628205
Cited by
1,393
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 79
FWCI
17.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Organization Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Keywords
organizational routines, procedural memory, distributed memory, organizational performance, collective action

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review