Cited by 93Plasma Applications and DiagnosticsMicrobial Inactivation MethodsPostharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management

Kinetics of inactivation of peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase in tender coconut water by dielectric barrier discharge plasma

Chutia, Hemanta, Kalita, Dipankar, Mahanta, Charu Lata, Ojah, Namita, Choudhury, Arup Jyoti·2019·LWT

Abstract

The spoilage enzymes in tender coconut water were inactivated by atmospheric cold plasma technology. The kinetics of peroxidase (POD) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) inactivation was studied at voltage levels varying between 18 and 28 kV dielectric barrier discharge plasma treatments (DBD) at atmospheric air. The time of treatment and applied voltage were significant factors for inactivation of the enzymes. POD was more resistant than PPO. The experimentally observed data were fitted to establish different kinetics models and model parameters were evaluated. The sigmoidal logistic was the best fitting model to explain the kinetics of browning enzymes inactivation based on high RMSE values. The time required for half maximal activity values for POD was 0.84, 1.67 and 2.53 min at 18 kV, 23 kV and 28 kV, respectively which was higher than PPO with half maximal activity values of 0.67, 1.18 and 1.35 min, respectively. This indicates that POD is more resistant to cold plasma than PPO and its inactivation in tender coconut water by cold plasma can be considered as a crucial quality parameter. DBD generated cold plasma can therefore be used to process fruits and vegetables juices wherein enzymes activity is one of the quality deterioration parameters.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.11.071

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chutia, H., Kalita, D., Mahanta, C. L., Ojah, N., & Choudhury, A. J.
Affiliations
Tezpur University (IN)
Corresponding author
Mahanta, Charu Lata
Venue
LWT
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
101
Pages
625-629
ISSN
0023-6438 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2900610374
Cited by
93
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4
FWCI
5.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
LWT (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Plasma Applications and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
Keywords
dielectric barrier discharge, non-thermal plasma, peroxidase inactivation, polyphenol oxidase inactivation, tender coconut water, enzyme inactivation kinetics, plasma voltage, fruit juice spoilage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review