Cited by 40Plasma Applications and DiagnosticsMicrobial Inactivation MethodsRadiation Effects and Dosimetry

Recent Advances in Cold Plasma Technology for Food Processing

Mehta, Deepak, Yadav, Sudesh Kumar·2022·Food Engineering Reviews

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12393-022-09317-z

Cites

207 of 207 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mehta, D., & Yadav, S. K.
Corresponding author
Yadav, Sudesh Kumar
Venue
Food Engineering Reviews
Published
2022-06-13
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
555-578
ISSN
  • 1866-7910 (ISSN-L)
  • 1866-7929
OpenAlex
W4282833414
Cited by
39
References
207
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Food Engineering Reviews (publishedVersion)
Funders
Department of Biotechnology , Ministry of Science and Technology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Plasma Applications and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Radiation Effects and Dosimetry
Keywords
non-thermal plasma, food processing, microbial decontamination, enzyme denaturation, pesticide degradation, food allergens, polyphenols, food packaging, reactive species, food safety, upscaling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review