Cited by 87Wound Healing and TreatmentsDermatologic Treatments and ResearchLiver physiology and pathology

Identification of a myofibroblast-specific expression signature in skin wounds

Bergmeier, Vera, Etich, Julia, Pitzler, Lena, Frie, Christian, Koch, Manuel, Fischer, Matthias, Rappl, Gunter, Abken, Hinrich +2 more·2018·Matrix Biology

Abstract

After skin injury fibroblasts migrate into the wound and transform into contractile, extracellular matrix-producing myofibroblasts to promote skin repair. Persistent activation of myofibroblasts can cause excessive fibrotic reactions, but the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. We used SMA-GFP transgenic mice to study myofibroblast recruitment and activation in skin wounds. Myofibroblasts were initially recruited to wounds three days post injury, their number reached a maximum after seven days and subsequently declined. Expression profiling showed that 1749 genes were differentially expressed in sorted myofibroblasts from wounds seven days post injury. Most of these genes were linked with the extracellular region and cell periphery including genes encoding for extracellular matrix proteins. A unique panel of core matrisome and matrisome-associated genes was differentially expressed in myofibroblasts and several genes not yet known to be linked to myofibroblast-mediated wound healing were found (e.g. Col24a1, Podnl1, Bvcan, Tinagl1, Thbs3, Adamts16, Adamts19, Cxcl's, Ccl's). In addition, a complex network of G protein-coupled signaling events was regulated in myofibroblasts (e.g. Adcy1, Plbc4, Gnas). Hence, this first characterization of a myofibroblast-specific expression profile at the peak of in situ granulation tissue formation provides important insights into novel target genes that may control excessive ECM deposition during fibrotic reactions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.matbio.2017.07.005

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fibroblasts are capable of remarkable plasticity and phenotype switching during progression and regression of fibrosis.

    “Fibroblasts, in addition to displaying significant functional heterogeneity, are capable of remarkable degrees of plasticity and phenotype switching during progression and regression of fibrosis30,35,36.”

    From Fibrosis: from mechanisms to medicines (2020) · cites this paper as [35]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bergmeier, V., Etich, J., Pitzler, L., Frie, C., Koch, M., Fischer, M., Rappl, G., Abken, H., Tomasek, J. J., & Brachvogel, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
Corresponding author
Brachvogel, Bent
Venue
Matrix Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
65
Pages
59-74
ISSN
0945-053X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2742741708
Cited by
87
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Matrix Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
Keywords
myofibroblasts, skin wound healing, gene expression signatures, extracellular matrix, matrisome, fibrosis, granulation tissue, fibroblast recruitment, G protein-coupled receptor signaling, extracellular matrix deposition
MeSH terms
Actins, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Disease Models, Animal, Gene Expression Regulation, Mice, Transgenic, Organ Specificity, Skin, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, Mice, Gene Regulatory Networks, Myofibroblasts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review