The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An approach to develop printable strain hardening cementitious composites
Open accessAbstract
New additive manufacturing methods for cementitious materials hold a high potential to increase automation in the construction industry. However, these methods require new materials to be developed that meet performance requirements related to specific characteristics of the manufacturing process. The appropriate characterization methods of these materials are still a matter of debate. This study proposes a rheology investigation to systematically develop a printable strain hardening cementitious composite mix design. Two known mixtures were employed and the influence of several parameters, such as the water-to-solid ratio, fibre volume percentage and employment of chemical admixtures, were investigated using a ram extruder and Benbow-Bridgwater equation. Through printing trials, rheology parameters as the initial bulk and shear yield stress were correlated with variables commonly employed to assess printing quality of cementitious materials. The rheology properties measured were used to predict the number of layers a developed mixture could support. Selected mixtures had their mechanical performance assessed through four-point bending, uni-axial tensile and compressive strength tests, to confirm that strain hardening behaviour was obtained. It was concluded that the presented experimental and theoretical framework are promising tools, as the bulk yield stress seems to predict buildability, while shear yield stress may indicate a threshold for pumpability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bos, F., Wolfs, R., Ahmed, Z., & Salet, T. (2016) · Virtual and Physical Prototyping · doi:10.1080/17452759.2016.1209867 · Cited by 1,257
Self-citationDevelopments in construction-scale additive manufacturing processes
Lim, S., Buswell, R. A., Le, T. T., Austin, S. A., Gibb, A. G. F., & Thorpe, T. (2012) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.010 · Cited by 1,205
Cited by
Large-scale 3D printing concrete technology: Current status and future opportunities
Xiao, J., Ji, G., Zhang, Y., Ma, G., Mechtcherine, V., Pan, J., Wang, L., Ding, T., Duan, Z., & Du, S. (2021) · Cement and Concrete Composites · doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104115 · Cited by 532
Extrusion-based concrete 3D printing from a material perspective: A state-of-the-art review
Mohan, M. K., Rahul, A. V., De Schutter, G., & Van Tittelboom, K. (2021) · Cement and Concrete Composites · doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103855 · Cited by 384
Extrusion and rheology characterization of geopolymer nanocomposites used in 3D printing
Panda, B., Unluer, C., & Tan, M. J. (2019) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107290 · Cited by 285
Al Rashid, A., Khan, S. A., G. Al-Ghamdi, S., & Koç, M. (2020) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103268 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Chaves Figueiredo, S., Romero Rodríguez, C., Ahmed, Z. Y., Bos, D. H., Xu, Y., Salet, T. M., Çopuroğlu, O., Schlangen, E., & Bos, F. P.
- Venue
- Materials & Design
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 169
- Pages
- 107651
- ISSN
- 0264-1275 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2921155042
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An approach to develop printable strain hardening cementitious composites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107651
- The paper
- Chaves Figueiredo, S., Romero Rodríguez, C., Ahmed, Z. Y., Bos, D. H., Xu, Y., Salet, T. M., Çopuroğlu, O., Schlangen, E., & Bos, F. P. (2019). An approach to develop printable strain hardening cementitious composites. Materials & Design. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107651
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.