Cited by 47Cytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchEstrogen and related hormone effects

An androgen-IL-6-Stat3 autocrine loop re-routes EGF signal in prostate cancer cells.

Aaronson, David S., Muller, Melissa, Neves, Susana R., Chung, Wen-Chen, Jayaram, Gomathi, Iyengar, Ravi, Ram, Prahlad T.·2007·Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology

Abstract

Dynamic modulation of information flow within signaling networks allows the cell to respond to micro-environmental changes. This property of the cell, while being essential to survival and eliciting appropriate responses, can also be detrimental to the organism by allowing cancerous cells to evade regulation and proliferate. We determined if changes in expression levels of transcriptional regulators and their interactions could alter routing within signaling networks in prostate cancer cells. Increasing the protein levels of the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3) led to Stat3-androgen receptor (AR) complex formation in response to epidermal growth factor (EGF) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) stimulation. Increasing the protein levels of Stat3 increased the EGF induced transcriptional activation of the androgen receptor. Androgen pre-treatment increased Stat3 protein levels in an IL-6 autocrine/paracrine dependent manner in the cells suggesting a feedback loop within cells. Increased Stat3-AR complex leads to a change in the routing of the epidermal growth factor signal allowing the androgen receptor to become activated in a Stat3 dependent manner. Understanding interactions and changes in signal flow within the cell is important to our understanding of signaling networks as well as our ability to identify cellular targets for novel therapies to inhibit cancer progression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mce.2007.02.006

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aaronson, D. S., Muller, M., Neves, S. R., Chung, W.-C., Jayaram, G., Iyengar, R., & Ram, P. T.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Ram, Prahlad T.
Venue
Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-05
Volume
270
Issue
1-2
Pages
50-56
ISSN
0303-7207 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006278935
Cited by
47
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
Keywords
prostate cancer, androgen receptor, STAT3, interleukin-6, epidermal growth factor, autocrine signaling, transcriptional activation, feedback loops, tumor progression
MeSH terms
Epidermal Growth Factor, Humans, Male, Prostatic Neoplasms, Receptors, Androgen, RNA, Messenger, Signal Transduction, Metribolone, Interleukin-6, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Autocrine Communication, Feedback, Physiological, STAT3 Transcription Factor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review