Cited by 32Chronic Disease Management StrategiesHealth Policy Implementation ScienceHealthcare Quality and Management

Assessing the Effectiveness of Integrated Interventions: Terminology and Approach

Smith, Graeme, Clarke, David·2006·Medical Clinics of North America

Abstract

Integrated care is a term that embraces several concepts, all of which imply that the target patients have complex or chronic illness. There is an assumption that such patients require integrated care and benefit from it. Attempts to test this hypothesis have produced evidence of only modest benefit, and much of the evidence is conflicting. Demonstration of effectiveness of integrated interventions in the clinical setting has been less convincing. Often, interventions are introduced uncritically and without adequate follow-up of their effectiveness. More rigorous research is required on definitions, theoretic constructs,outcome measures, the science of data synthesis, and translation to the clinical setting. Recent developments in theoretic constructs in these areas give promise of better answers to the question, "What works for whom in what context?". Qualitative methodology should form part of this research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mcna.2006.04.006

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, G., & Clarke, D.
Affiliations
Monash Medical Centre (AU)
Corresponding author
Smith, Graeme
Venue
Medical Clinics of North America
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-07
Volume
90
Issue
4
Pages
533-548
ISSN
0025-7125 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162593386
Cited by
32
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Clinics of North America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
integrated care, integrated intervention, effectiveness evaluation, chronic disease, complex care, outcome measures, data synthesis, theory of change, clinical implementation, qualitative research, evidence-based practice
MeSH terms
Cooperative Behavior, Humans, Terminology as Topic, Patient Care Management, Social Behavior Disorders, Sociology, Medical, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry), Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Evidence-Based Medicine, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Interdisciplinary Communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review