Cited by 276Cancer survivorship and careEconomic and Financial Impacts of CancerHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Efficacy and medical cost offset of psychosocial interventions in cancer care: making the case for economic analyses

Carlson, Linda E., Bultz, Barry D.·2004·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

The burden of cancer in the worldwide context continues to grow, as incidence and mortality increase each year. Regardless of where they live, a significant proportion of cancer patients at all stages of the disease trajectory will suffer social, emotional and psychological morbidity as a result of their diagnosis and treatment. Psychosocial interventions have proven efficacious in helping patients and families overcome many of the challenges that arise consequent to a cancer diagnosis. Addressing psychosocial needs is an essential aspect of any model of adequate cancer care, however it may also prove to be a cornerstone in efforts to extend the reach of cost-effective cancer treatment to meet the growing global need. In order to set the stage for discussion of economic issues, this paper first briefly reviews the literature detailing the extent of distress and the efficacy of psychosocial treatments for cancer patients. This is followed by a summary of terminology and costing concepts in the economic evaluation of psychosocial treatments, and a review of the literature on medical cost offset in mental health, other medical populations, and in cancer patients. The literature clearly supports the notion that psychosocial interventions are not only effective, but also economical. Conclusions support adding costing data into evaluations of the efficacy of psychosocial treatments in order to detail the often present but usually overlooked long-term cost savings that may be accrued to overburdened health-care systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.832

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Distress in cancer patients has been associated with non-adherence to anti-cancer medications; increased number of clinic and emergency room visits, longer hospital stays; worse quality of life and inferior survival.

    “Distress in cancer patients has been associated with non-adherence to anti-cancer medications; increased number of clinic and emergency room visits, longer hospital stays [55, 56]; worse quality of life and inferior survival [57–59].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 84 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carlson, L. E., & Bultz, B. D.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Carlson, Linda E.
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-12
Volume
13
Issue
12
Pages
837-849
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W2100988689
Cited by
276
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 11
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
psychosocial interventions, cancer patients, economic evaluation, cost offsets, cost-effectiveness, psychological distress, mental health care costs, cancer care, healthcare cost reduction
MeSH terms
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Depression, Humans, Mental Health Services, Neoplasms, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Health Care Costs, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review