European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents the combined mid-term findings of the consumer research components of two EU Sixth Framework Programme integrated projects concerning meat, ProSafeBeef and Q-PorkChains. The consumer pillar of ProSafeBeef carried out eight focus group discussions in May 2008, in France, Germany, Spain and the UK. Q-PorkChains conducted a large-scale, web-based, consumer survey in January 2008 in Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece and Poland. The first project provides a set of qualitative data from a small cohort of focus groups and the second a set of quantitative data from a larger consumer sample. This paper draws together the main findings of both projects and provides a comprehensive overview of European citizens' and consumers' attitudes towards and preferences regarding beef and pork. In general, consumers consider meat to be a healthy and important component of the diet. Consumers support the development of technologies that can improve the health attributes of meat products and guarantee eating quality, but they have a negative view of what they see to be excessive manipulation and lack of naturalness in the production and processing of beef products. In the Q-PorkChains study consumer and citizen segments are identified and profiled. Consumer segments were built upon the frequency and variety of pork consumption. The citizen segments were built upon their attitudes towards pig production systems. Overall, the relationship between individuals' views as citizens and their behaviour as consumers was found to be quite weak and did not appear to greatly or systematically influence meat-buying habits. Future studies in both projects will concentrate on consumers' acceptance of innovative meat product concepts and products, with the aim of boosting consumer trust and invigorating the European beef and pork industries.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Care for the environment and sustainability are increasingly retained for analysis.
“the care for the environment and sustainability [38,39] are increasingly retained for analysis.”
From Consumer Understanding of Food Quality, Healthiness, and Environmental Impact: A Cross-National Perspective (2019) · cites this paper as [39]
There is often a gap between consumers' attitudes and behavior regarding environmental and animal welfare issues in meat consumption.
“A study realized in Europe showed that consumers give high importance to environmental and animal welfare issues but there is often a gap between attitudes and behavior (Verbeke et al., 2010).”
From Emerging trends in European food, diets and food industry (2018) · cites this paper as Verbeke et al., 2010
Cites
Adherence to a Mediterranean diet and survival in a Greek population
Trichopoulou, A., Costacou, T., Bamia, C., & Trichopoulos, D. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa025039 · Cited by 4,397 · see citing works
Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude–behavioral intention” gap
Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006) · Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3 · Cited by 2,524 · see citing works
Self-citationGrunert, K. G., Bredahl, L., & Brunsø, K. (2003) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/s0309-1740(03)00130-x · Cited by 873 · see citing works
Self-citationFuture trends and consumer lifestyles with regard to meat consumption
Grunert, K. G. (2006) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.04.016 · Cited by 440 · see citing works
Self-citationProfile and effects of consumer involvement in fresh meat
Verbeke, W., & Vackier, I. (2003) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2003.09.017 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Self-citationWhy consumers behave as they do with respect to food safety and risk information
Verbeke, W., Frewer, L. J., Scholderer, J., & Brabander, H. F. D. (2006) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2006.07.065 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Self-citationVerbeke, W., & Viaene, J. (1999) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/s0950-3293(99)00031-2 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Self-citationRisk perception and consumer willingness to pay for certified beef in Spain
Angulo, A., & Roig, J. M. G. (2007) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.05.008 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Processed meat intake and incidence of Type 2 diabetes in younger and middle-aged women
Schulze, M. B., Manson, J. E., Willett, W. C., & Hu, F. B. (2003) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-003-1220-7 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Muscle profiling: Characterizing the muscles of the beef chuck and round
Seggern, D. D. V., Calkins, C. R., Johnson, D. D., et al. (2005) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.04.010 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Disparities in food habits across Europe
Trichopoulou, A., Naska, A., Costacou, T., et al. (2002) · Proceedings of The Nutrition Society · doi:10.1079/pns2002188 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
The World Cancer Research Fund report 2007: A challenge for the meat processing industry
Demeyer, D. I., Honikel, K. O., & SMET, S. D. (2008) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.06.003 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Perceived risk and risk reduction strategies in the choice of beef by Irish consumers
McCarthy, M. B., & Henson, S. (2004) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.08.003 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Cox, D. N., Evans, G., & Lease, H. J. (2007) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.01.011 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Cosgrove, M., Flynn, A., & Kiely, M. E. (2005) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn20051427 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
The Emerging Role of Traceability and Information in Demand-Oriented Livestock Production
Verbeke, W. (2001) · Outlook on Agriculture · doi:10.5367/000000001101293733 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Self-citationSUSTAINABLE FOOD CONSUMPTION: EXPLORING THE CONSUMER ATTITUDE – BEHAVIOUR GAPPreprint
Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2004) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationLinseisen, J., Rohrmann, S., Norat, T., Gonzalez, C. A., Iraeta, M. D., Gómez, P. M., Chirlaque, M., Gómez‐Pozo, B., Ardanáz, E., Mattisson, I., et al. (2006) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1079/phn2005861 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Polkinghorne, R., Philpott, J., Gee, A., et al. (2008) · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture · doi:10.1071/ea05181 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Potential effect of cattle diets on the transmission of pathogenic to humans
Russell, J. B., Diez‐Gonzalez, F., & Jarvis, G. N. (2000) · Microbes and Infection · doi:10.1016/s1286-4579(00)00286-0 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
The Influence of Production Systems on Meat Quality, with Emphasis on Pork
Olsson, V., & Picková, J. (2005) · AMBIO · doi:10.1639/0044-7447(2005)034[0338:tiopso]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
The Influence of Production Systems on Meat Quality, with Emphasis on Pork
Olsson, V., & Picková, J. (2005) · AMBIO · doi:10.1579/0044-7447-34.4.338 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Pomar, C., Dubeau, F., Létourneau-Montminy, M.-P., et al. (2006) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2006.11.011 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Meat consumption and risk of colorectal cancer in Japan: The Miyagi Cohort Study
Sato, Y., Nakaya, N., Kuriyama, S., Nishino, Y., Tsubono, Y., & Tsuji, I. (2006) · European Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.1097/01.cej.0000197455.87356.05 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Petit, J., & van der Werf, H. M. G. (2003) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/s0301-4797(03)00105-1 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
da Fonseca, M. D. C. P., & Salay, E. (2007) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.11.003 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
(2009) · Wageningen Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.3920/978-90-8686-660-1 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Environmental Aspects of Ethical Animal Production
Siegford, J. M., Powers, W. J., & Grimes-Casey, H. G. (2008) · Poultry Science · doi:10.3382/ps.2007-00351 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Jacob, M. E., Fox, J. T., Reinstein, S. L., & Nagaraja, T. G. (2008) · Foodborne Pathogens and Disease · doi:10.1089/fpd.2008.0095 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
On the nutrition and health situation in the European Union
Elmadfa, I., & Weichselbaum, E. (2005) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1007/s10389-004-0090-x · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Advancing beef safety and quality: ProSafeBeef
Miles, L. M., & Caswell, H. (2008) · Nutrition Bulletin · doi:10.1111/j.1467-3010.2008.00687.x · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Animal Welfare Guidelines for Beef Producing Farms
Fallon, R. J., Earley, B., & Finnerty, M. (1998) · Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society
Verbeke, W. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.008 · Cited by 849 · see citing works
Self-citationPetrescu, D. C., Vermeir, I., & Petrescu-Mag, R. M. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17010169 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Hoek, A. C., Pearson, D., James, S. W., Lawrence, M. A., & Friel, S. (2017) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.09.030 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Emerging trends in European food, diets and food industry
Santeramo, F. G., Carlucci, D., De Devitiis, B., Seccia, A., Stasi, A., Viscecchia, R., & Nardone, G. (2018) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2017.10.039 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Curbing global meat consumption: Emerging evidence of a second nutrition transition
Vranken, L., Avermaete, T., Petalios, D., & Mathijs, E. (2014) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.02.009 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Hung, Y., de Kok, T. M., & Verbeke, W. (2016) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.06.002 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Self-citationFont i Furnols, M., Realini, C., Montossi, F., Sañudo, C., Campo, M. M., Oliver, M. A., Nute, G. R., & Guerrero, L. (2011) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.02.007 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
A cross-sectional survey of consumers’ risk perception and hygiene of retail meat: a Nigerian study
Odetokun, I. A., Borokinni, B. O., Bakare, S. D., Ghali-Mohammed, I., & Alhaji, N. B. (2021) · Food Protection Trends · doi:10.4315/1541-9576-41.3.274 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Verbeke, W., Pérez-Cueto, F. J. A., Barcellos, M. D. D., Krystallis, A., & Grunert, K. G.
- Affiliations
- Ghent University (BE)
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Verbeke, Wim
- Venue
- Meat Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 284-292
- ISSN
- 0309-1740 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047981636
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 2.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- autopapers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- Meat Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Keywords
- beef, pork, consumer attitudes, consumer preferences, meat consumption, customer segmentation, pig production systems, meat processing, eating quality, consumer trust, meat industry
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Welfare, Attitude, Attitude to Health, Cattle, Consumer Product Safety, Consumer Behavior, Europe, Food Preferences, Humans, Meat, Quality Control, Swine, Taste
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
