The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of virtual reality based training simulators for orthopaedic surgery
Open accessAbstract
This review presents current virtual reality based training simulators for hip, knee and other orthopaedic surgery, including elective and trauma surgical procedures. There have not been any reviews focussing on hip and knee orthopaedic simulators. A comparison of existing simulator features is provided to identify what is missing and what is required to improve upon current simulators. In total 11 hip replacements pre-operative planning tools were analysed, plus 9 hip trauma fracture training simulators. Additionally 9 knee arthroscopy simulators and 8 other orthopaedic simulators were included for comparison. The findings are that for orthopaedic surgery simulators in general, there is increasing use of patient-specific virtual models which reduce the learning curve. Modelling is also being used for patient-specific implant design and manufacture. Simulators are being increasingly validated for assessment as well as training. There are very few training simulators available for hip replacement, yet more advanced virtual reality is being used for other procedures such as hip trauma and drilling. Training simulators for hip replacement and orthopaedic surgery in general lag behind other surgical procedures for which virtual reality has become more common. Further developments are required to bring hip replacement training simulation up to date with other procedures. This suggests there is a gap in the market for a new high fidelity hip replacement and resurfacing training simulator.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeBlanc, J., Hutchison, C., Hu, Y., & Donnon, T. (2013) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.k.01284 · Cited by 66
Cited by
The Ethics of Realism in Virtual and Augmented Reality
Slater, M., Gonzalez-Liencres, C., Haggard, P., Vinkers, C., Gregory-Clarke, R., Jelley, S., Watson, Z., Breen, G., Schwarz, R., Steptoe, W., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Virtual Reality · doi:10.3389/frvir.2020.00001 · Cited by 410
Tang, Y. M., Chau, K. Y., Kwok, A. P. K., Zhu, T., & Ma, X. (2022) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100429 · Cited by 281
Virtual, augmented, and mixed reality applications in orthopedic surgery
Verhey, J. T., Haglin, J. M., Verhey, E. M., & Hartigan, D. E. (2020) · The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery · doi:10.1002/rcs.2067 · Cited by 264
A review of the evidence for training effectiveness with virtual reality technology
Abich, J., Parker, J., Murphy, J. S., & Eudy, M. (2021) · Virtual Reality · doi:10.1007/s10055-020-00498-8 · Cited by 253
Adaptive virtual reality-based training: a systematic literature review and framework
Zahabi, M., & Abdul Razak, A. M. (2020) · Virtual Reality · doi:10.1007/s10055-020-00434-w · Cited by 233
Metadata
- Authors
- Vaughan, N., Dubey, V. N., Wainwright, T. W., & Middleton, R. G.
- Venue
- Medical Engineering & Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2015-12-29
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 59-71
- ISSN
- 1350-4533 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-4030
- OpenAlex
- W2211264905
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of virtual reality based training simulators for orthopaedic surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.11.021
- The paper
- Vaughan, N., Dubey, V. N., Wainwright, T. W., & Middleton, R. G. (2016). A review of virtual reality based training simulators for orthopaedic surgery. Medical Engineering & Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.11.021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.