The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of prostate segmentation algorithms for MRI: The PROMISE12 challenge
Open accessAbstract
Prostate MRI image segmentation has been an area of intense research due to the increased use of MRI as a modality for the clinical workup of prostate cancer. Segmentation is useful for various tasks, e.g. to accurately localize prostate boundaries for radiotherapy or to initialize multi-modal registration algorithms. In the past, it has been difficult for research groups to evaluate prostate segmentation algorithms on multi-center, multi-vendor and multi-protocol data. Especially because we are dealing with MR images, image appearance, resolution and the presence of artifacts are affected by differences in scanners and/or protocols, which in turn can have a large influence on algorithm accuracy. The Prostate MR Image Segmentation (PROMISE12) challenge was setup to allow a fair and meaningful comparison of segmentation methods on the basis of performance and robustness. In this work we will discuss the initial results of the online PROMISE12 challenge, and the results obtained in the live challenge workshop hosted by the MICCAI2012 conference. In the challenge, 100 prostate MR cases from 4 different centers were included, with differences in scanner manufacturer, field strength and protocol. A total of 11 teams from academic research groups and industry participated. Algorithms showed a wide variety in methods and implementation, including active appearance models, atlas registration and level sets. Evaluation was performed using boundary and volume based metrics which were combined into a single score relating the metrics to human expert performance. The winners of the challenge where the algorithms by teams Imorphics and ScrAutoProstate, with scores of 85.72 and 84.29 overall. Both algorithms where significantly better than all other algorithms in the challenge (p<0.05) and had an efficient implementation with a run time of 8min and 3s per case respectively. Overall, active appearance model based approaches seemed to outperform other approaches like multi-atlas registration, both on accuracy and computation time. Although average algorithm performance was good to excellent and the Imorphics algorithm outperformed the second observer on average, we showed that algorithm combination might lead to further improvement, indicating that optimal performance for prostate segmentation is not yet obtained. All results are available online at http://promise12.grand-challenge.org/.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“PROMISE12 as the example in the prostate dataset is the dataset made for MICCAI prostate segmentation challenge, which was used by 11 academic teams for various segmentation algorithms and showed promising results”
From A review of deep learning-based deformable medical image registration (2022) · cites this paper as [55]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Robust Real-Time Face Detection
Viola, P., & Jones, M. J. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000013087.49260.fb · Cited by 14,097
Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm
Lorensen, W. E., & Cline, H. E. (1987) · ACM SIGGRAPH Conference (SIGGRAPH) · doi:10.1145/37401.37422 · Cited by 10,320
Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm
Lorensen, W. E., & Cline, H. E. (1987) · ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics · doi:10.1145/37402.37422 · Cited by 8,928
Cootes, T. F., Edwards, G. J., & Taylor, C. J. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.927467 · Cited by 5,409
ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012
Barentsz, J. O., Richenberg, J., Clements, R., Choyke, P. L., Verma, S., Villeirs, G. M., Rouvière, O., Løgager, V., & Fütterer, J. J. (2012) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2377-y · Cited by 2,444
Robust real-time object detection.
Viola, P. A. (2001) · Cited by 2,340
Warfield, S. K., Zou, K. H., & Wells, W. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2004.828354 · Cited by 2,072
Pérez, P., Gangnet, M., & Blake, A. (2003) · ACM SIGGRAPH Conference (SIGGRAPH) · doi:10.1145/1201775.882269 · Cited by 2,041
Pérez, P., Gangnet, M., & Blake, A. (2003) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/882262.882269 · Cited by 1,769
Comparison and evaluation of methods for liver segmentation from CT datasets
Heimann, T., van Ginneken, B., Styner, M. A., Arzhaeva, Y., Aurich, V., Bauer, C., Beck, A., Becker, C., Beichel, R., Bekes, G., et al. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2009.2013851 · Cited by 1,135
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Birkbeck, N., Zhang, J., Requardt, M., Kiefer, B., Gall, P., Kevin Zhou, S., 2012. Region-specific hierarchical segmentation of MR prostate using discriminative learning. MICCAI Grand Challenge: Prostate MR Image Segmentation 2012.
- Gao, Q., Rueckert, D., Edwards, P., 2012. An automatic multi-atlas based prostate segmentation using local appearance-specific atlases and patch-based voxel weighting. MICCAI Grand Challenge: Prostate MR Image Segmentation 2012.
- Ghose, S., Mitra, J., Oliver, A., Martí, R., Lladó, X., Freixenet, J., Vilanova, J.C., Sidibé, D., Meriaudeau, F., 2012. A random forest based classification approach to prostate segmentation in MRI. MICCAI Grand Challenge: Prostate MR Image Segmentation 2012.
- Kirschner, M., Jung, F., Wesarg, S., 2012. Automatic prostate segmentation in MR images with a probabilistic active shape model. MICCAI Grand Challenge: Prostate MR Image Segmentation 2012.
- Litjens, G.J.S., Karssemeijer, N., Huisman, H.J., 2012. A multi-atlas approach for prostate segmentation in MR images. MICCAI Grand Challenge: Prostate MR Image Segmentation 2012.
- Toth, 2012, Multifeature landmark-free active appearance models: application to prostate MRI segmentation, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 31, 1638, 10.1109/TMI.2012.2201498 · DOI
- Vincent, G., Guillard, G., Bowes, M., 2012. Fully automatic segmentation of the prostate using active appearance models. MICCAI Grand Challenge: Prostate MR Image Segmentation 2012.
- Yuan, J., Qiu, W., Ukwatta, E., Rajchl, M., Sun, Y., Fenster, A., 2012. An efficient convex optimization approach to 3D prostate MRI segmentation with generic star shape prior. MICCAI Grand Challenge: Prostate MR Image Segmentation 2012.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 856
A Systematic Collection of Medical Image Datasets for Deep Learning
Li, J., Zhu, G., Hua, C., Feng, M., Bennamoun, B., Li, P., Lu, X., Song, J., Shen, P., Xu, X., et al. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3615862 · Cited by 78
Evaluation of Deep Neural Networks for Semantic Segmentation of Prostate in T2W MRI
Khan, Z., Yahya, N., Alsaih, K., Ali, S. S. A., & Mériaudeau, F. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20113183 · Cited by 71
Explainable AI (XAI) in image segmentation in medicine, industry, and beyond: A survey
Gipiškis, R., Tsai, C.-W., & Kurasova, O. (2024) · ICT Express · doi:10.1016/j.icte.2024.09.008 · Cited by 75
Ushinsky, A., Bardis, M. D., Glavis‐Bloom, J., Uchio, E., Chantaduly, C., Nguyentat, M., Chow, D. S., Chang, P., & Houshyar, R. (2020) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.19.22168 · Cited by 70
Nordenskjöld, R., Malmberg, F., Larsson, E., Simmons, A., Ahlström, H. K., Johansson, L. O. M., & Kullberg, J. (2014) · Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2014.11.011 · Cited by 69
Self-citationConstrained deep networks: Lagrangian optimization via Log-barrier extensions
Kervadec, H., Dolz, J., Yuan, J., Desrosiers, C., Granger, É., & Ayed, I. B. (2022) · European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) · doi:10.23919/eusipco55093.2022.9909927 · Cited by 81
Self-citationSelf-paced and self-consistent co-training for semi-supervised image segmentation
Wang, P., Peng, J., Pedersoli, M., Zhou, Y., Zhang, C., & Desrosiers, C. (2021) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2021.102146 · Cited by 72
Self-aware and Cross-Sample Prototypical Learning for Semi-supervised Medical Image Segmentation
Zhang, Z., Ran, R., Tian, C., Zhou, H., Li, X., Yang, F., & Jiao, Z. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-43895-0_18 · Cited by 68
Variability of manual segmentation of the prostate in axial T2-weighted MRI: A multi-reader study
Becker, A. S., Chaitanya, K., Schawkat, K., Muehlematter, U. J., Hötker, A. M., Konukoğlu, E., & Donati, O. F. (2019) · European Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108716 · Cited by 67
Montagne, S., Hamzaoui, D., Allera, A., Ezziane, M., Luzurier, A., Quint, R., Kalai, M., Ayache, N., Delingette, H., & Renard‐Penna, R. (2021) · Insights into Imaging · doi:10.1186/s13244-021-01010-9 · Cited by 71
Kalantar, R., Lin, G., Winfield, J. M., Messiou, C., Lalondrelle, S., Blackledge, M., & Koh, D. (2021) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics11111964 · Cited by 67
MedShapeNet – a large-scale dataset of 3D medical shapes for computer vision
Li, J., Zhou, Z., Yang, J., Pepe, A., Gsaxner, C., Luijten, G., Qu, C., Zhang, T., Chen, X., Li, W., et al. (2024) · Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1515/bmt-2024-0396 · Cited by 82
Inter-site Variability in Prostate Segmentation Accuracy Using Deep Learning
Gibson, E., Hu, Y., Ghavami, N., Ahmed, H. U., Moore, C. M., Emberton, M., Huisman, H. J., & Barratt, D. C. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00937-3_58 · Cited by 66
Self-citationTranslating AI to Clinical Practice: Overcoming Data Shift with Explainability
Choi, Y., Yu, W., Nagarajan, M. B., Teng, P., Goldin, J. G., Raman, S. S., Enzmann, D. R., Kim, G. H. J., & Brown, M. S. (2023) · RadioGraphics · doi:10.1148/rg.220105 · Cited by 65
Segmentation of the Prostate Transition Zone and Peripheral Zone on MR Images with Deep Learning
Bardis, M. D., Houshyar, R., Chantaduly, C., Tran-Harding, K., Ushinsky, A., Chahine, C., Rupasinghe, M., Chow, D. S., & Chang, P. D. (2021) · Radiology Imaging Cancer · doi:10.1148/rycan.2021200024 · Cited by 64
Johnsson, K., Brynolfsson, J., Sahlstedt, H., Nickols, N. G., Rettig, M. B., Probst, S., Morris, M. J., Bjartell, A. S., Eiber, M., & Anand, A. (2021) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-021-05497-8 · Cited by 64
Plug‐and‐play segment anything model improves nnUNet performance
Li, Y., Jing, B., Li, Z., Wang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.17481 · Cited by 64
Computer-aided Detection of Prostate Cancer with MRI
Liu, L., Tian, Z., Zhang, Z., & Fei, B. (2016) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2016.03.010 · Cited by 64
Deep dense multi-path neural network for prostate segmentation in magnetic resonance imaging
To, M. N. N., Vu, Q. D., Türkbey, B., Choyke, P. L., & Kwak, J. T. (2018) · International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11548-018-1841-4 · Cited by 63
Gunashekar, D. D., Bielak, L., Hägele, L., Oerther, B., Benndorf, M., Grosu, A., Brox, T., Zamboglou, C., & Bock, M. (2022) · Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13014-022-02035-0 · Cited by 69
Radiomics and radiogenomics of prostate cancer
Smith, C. P., Czarniecki, M., Mehralivand, S., Stoyanova, R. S., Choyke, P. L., Harmon, S. A., & Türkbey, B. (2018) · Abdominal Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00261-018-1660-7 · Cited by 63
Nie, D., Wang, L., Gao, Y., Lian, J., & Shen, D. G. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2018.2870182 · Cited by 64
van Sloun, R. J. G., Wildeboer, R. R., Mannaerts, C. K., Postema, A. W., Gayet, M. C. W., Beerlage, H. P., Salomon, G., Wijkstra, H., & Mischi, M. (2019) · European Urology Focus · doi:10.1016/j.euf.2019.04.009 · Cited by 63
Bounding boxes for weakly supervised segmentation: Global constraints get close to full supervisionPreprint
Kervadec, H., Dolz, J., Wang, S., Granger, É., & Ayed, I. B. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.06816 · Cited by 66
Sanford, T., Zhang, L., Harmon, S. A., Sackett, J., Yang, D., Roth, H. R., Xu, Z., Kesani, D., Mehralivand, S., Baroni, R. H., et al. (2020) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.19.22347 · Cited by 62
Rundo, L., Militello, C., Russo, G. I., Garufi, A., Vitabile, S., Gilardi, M. C., & Mauri, G. (2017) · Information · doi:10.3390/info8020049 · Cited by 68
Zabihollahy, F., Schieda, N., Jeyaraj, S. K., & Ukwatta, E. (2019) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.13550 · Cited by 62
Park, S., Chu, L. C. H., Fishman, E. K., Yuille, A., Vogelstein, B., Kinzler, K. W., Horton, K. M., Hruban, R. H., Zinreich, E. S., Fouladi, D. F., et al. (2019) · Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.diii.2019.05.008 · Cited by 63
Prostate lesion segmentation in MR images using radiomics based deeply supervised U-Net
Hambarde, P., Talbar, S. N., Mahajan, A., Chavan, S., Thakur, M., & Sable, N. P. (2020) · Journal of Applied Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.bbe.2020.07.011 · Cited by 61
Pseudo Labeling Methods for Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation: A Review and Future Perspectives
Ran, L., Li, Y., Liang, G., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2024.3508768 · Cited by 66
Bardis, M. D., Houshyar, R., Chang, P., Ushinsky, A., Glavis‐Bloom, J., Chahine, C., Bui, T., Rupasinghe, M., Filippi, C. G., & Chow, D. S. (2020) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers12051204 · Cited by 64
Anisotropic 3D Multi-Stream CNN for Accurate Prostate Segmentation from Multi-Planar MRI
Meyer, A., Chlebus, G., Rak, M., Schindele, D., Schostak, M., van Ginneken, B., Schenk, A., Meine, H., Hahn, H. K., Schreiber, A., et al. (2020) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105821 · Cited by 60
Artificial intelligence with deep learning in nuclear medicine and radiology
Decuyper, M., Maebe, J., Holen, R. V., & Vandenberghe, S. (2021) · EJNMMI Physics · doi:10.1186/s40658-021-00426-y · Cited by 61
Saito, A., Nawano, S., & Shimizu, A. (2015) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2015.11.003 · Cited by 60
Adversarial Confidence Learning for Medical Image Segmentation and Synthesis
Nie, D., & Shen, D. G. (2020) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-020-01321-2 · Cited by 60
Attention-Assisted Adversarial Model for Cerebrovascular Segmentation in 3D TOF-MRA Volumes
Chen, Y., Jin, D., Guo, B., & Bai, X. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2022.3186731 · Cited by 59
Liu, J., Desrosiers, C., & Zhou, Y. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16452-1_14 · Cited by 59
Liu, J., Desrosiers, C., Yu, D., & Zhou, Y. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2023.3338269 · Cited by 59
ScribblePrompt: Fast and Flexible Interactive Segmentation for Any Biomedical Image
Wong, H. E., Rakic, M., Guttag, J. V., & Dalca, A. V. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73661-2_12 · Cited by 85
Lekadir, K., Osuala, R., Gallin, C., Lazrak, N., Kushibar, K., Tsakou, G., Aussó, S., Alberich, L. C., Marias, K., Tsiknakis, M., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.09658 · Cited by 58
MS-NAS: Multi-scale Neural Architecture Search for Medical Image Segmentation
Yan, X., Jiang, W., Shi, Y., & Zhuo, C. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59710-8_38 · Cited by 58
González, C., Gotkowski, K., Fuchs, M., Bucher, A. M., Dadras, A. A., Fischbach, R., Kaltenborn, I., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2022) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2022.102596 · Cited by 59
Active learning for medical image segmentation with stochastic batches
Gaillochet, M., Desrosiers, C., & Lombaert, H. (2023) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2023.102958 · Cited by 57
Graph‐convolutional‐network‐based interactive prostate segmentation in MR images
Tian, Z., Li, X., Zheng, Y., Chen, Z., Zhong, S. S., Liu, L., & Fei, B. (2020) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.14327 · Cited by 57
MSD-Net: Multi-Scale Discriminative Network for COVID-19 Lung Infection Segmentation on CT
Zheng, B., Liu, Y., Zhu, Y. M., Yu, F., Jiang, T., Yang, D., & Xu, T. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3027738 · Cited by 57
Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Prostate Cancer
Rabaan, A. A., Bakhrebah, M. A., AlSaihati, H., Alhumaid, S., Alsubki, R. A., Turkistani, S. A., Al-Abdulhadi, S., Aldawood, Y., Alsaleh, A. A., Alhashem, Y. N., et al. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14225595 · Cited by 56
Sumathipala, Y., Lay, N. S., Türkbey, B., Smith, C., Choyke, P. L., & Summers, R. M. (2018) · Journal of medical imaging · doi:10.1117/1.jmi.5.4.044507 · Cited by 55
Registration of presurgical MRI and histopathology images from radical prostatectomy via RAPSODI
Rusu, M., Shao, W., Kunder, C. A., Wang, J. B., Soerensen, S. J. C., Teslovich, N. C., Sood, R., Chen, L. C., Fan, R. E., Ghanouni, P., et al. (2020) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.14337 · Cited by 55
Baldeon-Calisto, M., & Lai-Yuen, S. K. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102154 · Cited by 54
Multiscale transunet + + : dense hybrid U-Net with transformer for medical image segmentation
Wang, B., Wang, F., Dong, P., & Li, C. (2022) · Signal Image and Video Processing · doi:10.1007/s11760-021-02115-w · Cited by 55
Zeng, Q., Fu, Y., Tian, Z., Lei, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, T., Mao, H. Z., Liu, T., Curran, W. J., Jani, A. B., et al. (2020) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ab8cd6 · Cited by 53
MaxStyle: Adversarial Style Composition for Robust Medical Image Segmentation
Chen, C., Li, Z., Ouyang, C., Sinclair, M. D., Bai, W., & Rueckert, D. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16443-9_15 · Cited by 55
DLTTA: Dynamic Learning Rate for Test-Time Adaptation on Cross-Domain Medical Images
Yang, H., Chen, C., Jiang, M., Liu, Q., Cao, J., Heng, P., & Dou, Q. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2022.3191535 · Cited by 52
Decentralized Learning in Healthcare: A Review of Emerging Techniques
Shiranthika, C., Saeedi, P., & Bajić, I. V. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3281832 · Cited by 55
Lifelong nnU-Net: a framework for standardized medical continual learning
González, C., Ranem, A., dos Santos, D. P., Othman, A. E., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-34484-2 · Cited by 52
Automatic segmentation approach to extracting neonatal cerebral ventricles from 3D ultrasound images
Qiu, W., Chen, Y., Kishimoto, J., de Ribaupierre, S., Chiu, B. C. Y., Fenster, A., & Yuan, J. Y. (2016) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.06.038 · Cited by 55
Self-citationSelf-Paced Contrastive Learning for Semi-supervised Medical Image Segmentation with Meta-labelsPreprint
Peng, J., Wang, P., Desrosiers, C., & Pedersoli, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.13741 · Cited by 52
Generalizable Multi-Site Training and Testing Of Deep Neural Networks Using Image Normalization
Onofrey, J. A., Casetti-Dinescu, D. I., Lauritzen, A. D., Sarkar, S., Venkataraman, R., Fan, R. E., Sonn, G. A., Sprenkle, P. C., Staib, L. H., & Papademetris, X. (2019) · 2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2019.8759295 · Cited by 52
A flexible 2.5D medical image segmentation approach with in-slice and cross-slice attention
Kumar, A., Jiang, H., Imran, M., Valdes, C., León, G. M., Kang, D., Nataraj, P. S., Zhou, Y., Weiss, M. D., & Shao, W. (2024) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109173 · Cited by 58
Segmentation of prostate and prostate zones using deep learning
Zavala‐Romero, O., Breto, A., Xu, I. R. L., Chang, Y.-C., Gautney, N., Pra, A. D., Abramowitz, M. C., Pollack, A. S., & Stoyanova, R. S. (2020) · Strahlentherapie und Onkologie · doi:10.1007/s00066-020-01607-x · Cited by 51
A Comprehensive Review of Modern Object Segmentation Approaches
Wang, Y., Ahsan, U., Li, H., & Hagen, M. (2022) · Foundations and Trends® in Computer Graphics and Vision · doi:10.1561/0600000097 · Cited by 54
Feature Alignment and Uniformity for Test Time Adaptation
Wang, S., Zhang, D.-A., Yan, Z., Zhang, J., & Li, R. (2023) · Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01920 · Cited by 84
Self-citationProstate Segmentation using 2D Bridged U-net
Chen, W., Zhang, Y., He, J., Qiao, Y., Chen, Y., Shi, H., Wu, E. X., & Tang, X. (2019) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2019.8851908 · Cited by 51
Deep Learning in Radiation Oncology Treatment Planning for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
Almeida, G. N., & Tavares, J. M. R. S. (2020) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-020-01641-3 · Cited by 50
Mehta, P. J., Antonelli, M., Ahmed, H. U., Emberton, M., Punwani, S., & Sebastien Ourselin, A. (2021) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2021.102153 · Cited by 49
Bilateral Supervision Network for Semi-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation
He, A., Li, T., Yan, J., Wang, K., & Fu, H. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2023.3347689 · Cited by 49
Review of Federated Learning and Machine Learning-Based Methods for Medical Image Analysis
Hernandez-Cruz, N., Saha, P., Sarker, M. M. K., & Noble, J. A. (2024) · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · doi:10.3390/bdcc8090099 · Cited by 51
Abraham, B., & Nair, P. (. ). M. S. (2018) · Journal of Applied Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.bbe.2018.06.009 · Cited by 48
Bounding Box Tightness Prior for Weakly Supervised Image Segmentation
Wang, J., & Xia, B. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87196-3_49 · Cited by 49
Liu, Q., Chen, C., Dou, Q., & Heng, P. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i2.20068 · Cited by 50
Explainable Federated Medical Image Analysis Through Causal Learning and Blockchain
Mu, J., Kadoch, M., Yuan, T., Lv, W., Liu, Q., & Li, B. (2024) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2024.3375894 · Cited by 46
CNN-Based Prostate Zonal Segmentation on T2-Weighted MR Images: A Cross-Dataset Study
Rundo, L., Han, C., Zhang, J., Hataya, R., Nagano, Y., Militello, C., Ferretti, C., Nobile, M. S., Tangherloni, A., Gilardi, M. C., et al. (2019) · Smart innovation, systems and technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8950-4_25 · Cited by 46
Self-citationInteractive medical image segmentation via a point-based interaction
Zhang, J., Shi, Y., Sun, J., Wang, L., Zhou, L., Gao, Y., & Shen, D. G. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101998 · Cited by 49
Self-citationZhang, L., Zhang, K., & Pan, H. (2023) · Tsinghua Science & Technology · doi:10.26599/tst.2022.9010023 · Cited by 45
Federated Learning in Computer Vision
Shenaj, D., Rizzoli, G., & Zanuttigh, P. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3310400 · Cited by 48
Automatic Segmentation with Deep Learning in Radiotherapy
Isaksson, L. J., Summers, P. E., Mastroleo, F., Marvaso, G., Corrao, G., Vincini, M. G., Zaffaroni, M., Ceci, F., Petralia, G., Orecchia, R., et al. (2023) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers15174389 · Cited by 45
Difficulty-Aware Attention Network with Confidence Learning for Medical Image Segmentation
Nie, D., Wang, L., Xiang, L., Zhou, S., Adeli, E., & Shen, D. G. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011085 · Cited by 45
Hybrid descriptive‐inferential method for key feature selection in prostate cancer radiomics
Barone, S., Cannella, R., Comelli, A., Pellegrino, A., Salvaggio, G., Stefano, A., & Vernuccio, F. (2021) · Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry · doi:10.1002/asmb.2642 · Cited by 43
Medical image diagnosis of prostate tumor based on PSP-Net+VGG16 deep learning network
Ye, L.-Y., Miao, X.-Y., Cai, W.-S., & Xu, W.-J. (2022) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106770 · Cited by 43
U-Net Architecture for Prostate Segmentation: The Impact of Loss Function on System Performance
Montazerolghaem, M., Yu, S. Y., Sasso, G., & Haworth, A. (2023) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering10040412 · Cited by 43
Decoupled Consistency for Semi-supervised Medical Image Segmentation
Chen, F., Fei, J., Chen, Y., & Huang, C. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-43907-0_53 · Cited by 43
DeepISLES: a clinically validated ischemic stroke segmentation model from the ISLES'22 challenge
de la Rosa, E., Reyes, M., Liew, S., Hutton, A., Wiest, R., Kaesmacher, J., Hanning, U. M. P., Hakim, A., Zubal, R., Valenzuela, W., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-62373-x · Cited by 43
Computer-aided detection of prostate cancer in T2-weighted MRI within the peripheral zone
Rampun, A., Zheng, L., Malcolm, P., Tiddeman, B., & Reyer Zwiggelaar, A. (2016) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/61/13/4796 · Cited by 42
A propagation-DNN: Deep combination learning of multi-level features for MR prostate segmentation
Yan, K., Wang, X., Kim, J., Khadra, M. H., FULHAM, M. J., & Feng, D. D. (2018) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.12.031 · Cited by 42
Cascade Dense-Unet for Prostate Segmentation in MR Images
Li, S., Chen, Y., Yang, S., & Luo, W. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-26763-6_46 · Cited by 42
Ostmeier, S., Axelrod, B., Isensee, F., Bertels, J., Mlynash, M., Christensen, S., Lansberg, M. G., Albers, G. W., Sheth, R., Verhaaren, B. F. J., et al. (2023) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2023.102927 · Cited by 41
SmartPaint: a tool for interactive segmentation of medical volume images
Malmberg, F., Nordenskjöld, R., Strand, R., & Kullberg, J. (2014) · Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering Imaging & Visualization · doi:10.1080/21681163.2014.960535 · Cited by 41
Self-citationDeep Learning-Based Cancer Detection-Recent Developments, Trend and Challenges
Kumar, G., & Alqahtani, H. (2021) · Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences · doi:10.32604/cmes.2022.018418 · Cited by 40
Gao, Z., Wu, F., Gao, W., & Zhuang, X. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2022.3220750 · Cited by 39
Convolutional Neural Networks for Prostate Magnetic Resonance Image Segmentation
Hassanzadeh, T., Hamey, L., & Ho‐Shon, K. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2903284 · Cited by 39
Discretely-constrained deep network for weakly supervised segmentation
Peng, J., Kervadec, H., Dolz, J., Ayed, I. B., Pedersoli, M., & Desrosiers, C. (2020) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2020.07.011 · Cited by 40
Yang, M., Çolak, C., Chundru, K. K., Gaj, S., Nanavati, A. K., Jones, M. H., Winalski, C. S., Subhas, N., & Li, X. (2022) · Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.21037/qims-21-459 · Cited by 39
Neural Ordinary Differential Equations for Semantic Segmentation of Individual Colon GlandsPreprint
Pinckaers, H., & Litjens, G. J. S. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.10470 · Cited by 39
Self-citationInvestigation and benchmarking of U-Nets on prostate segmentation tasks
Bhandary, S., Kuhn, D., Babaiee, Z., Fechter, T., Benndorf, M., Zamboglou, C., Grosu, A., & Grosu, R. (2023) · Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2023.102241 · Cited by 39
MedSegBench: A comprehensive benchmark for medical image segmentation in diverse data modalities
Kuş, Z., & Aydın, M. (2024) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-024-04159-2 · Cited by 47
A comprehensive non-invasive framework for diagnosing prostate cancer
Reda, I., Shalaby, A. M., Elmogy, M. M., Elfotouh, A. M. A., Khalifa, F., El‐Ghar, M. A., Hosseini-Asl, E., Gimel’farb, G., Werghi, N., & El-Baz, A. S. (2016) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.12.010 · Cited by 37
Brosch, T., Peters, J., Groth, A., Stehlé, T., & Weese, J. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00937-3_59 · Cited by 37
Skin lesion segmentation with deep learning
Lameski, J., Jovanov, A., Zdravevski, E., Lameski, P., & Gievska, S. (2019) · IEEE EUROCON - International Conference on Computer as a Tool (EUROCON) · doi:10.1109/eurocon.2019.8861636 · Cited by 37
Soerensen, S. J. C., Fan, R. E., Seetharaman, A., Chen, L. C., Shao, W., Bhattacharya, I., Kim, Y.-H., Sood, R., Borre, M., Chung, B. I., et al. (2021) · The Journal of Urology · doi:10.1097/ju.0000000000001783 · Cited by 37
Domain Composition and Attention for Unseen-Domain Generalizable Medical Image Segmentation
Gu, R., Zhang, J., Huang, R., Lei, W., Wang, G., & Zhang, S. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87199-4_23 · Cited by 37
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Litjens, G., Toth, R., van de Ven, W., Hoeks, C., Kerkstra, S., van Ginneken, B., Vincent, G., Guillard, G., Birbeck, N., Zhang, J., Strand, R., Malmberg, F., Ou, Y., Davatzikos, C., Kirschner, M., Jung, F., Yuan, J., Qiu, W., Gao, Q., Edwards, P. “., Maan, B., van der Heijden, F., Ghose, S., Mitra, J., Dowling, J., Barratt, D., Huisman, H., & Madabhushi, A.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
- Siemens (United States) (US)
- Uppsala University (SE)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
- Robarts Research Institute (CA)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- University of Twente (NL)
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- University College London (GB)
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Litjens, Geert
- ORCID
- Venue
- Medical Image Analysis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 359-373
- ISSN
- 1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4137968
- OpenAlex
- W2106033751
- Cited by
- 857
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 107 · 2025: 127 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 106 · 2022: 92 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 10
- FWCI
- 19.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Medical Image Analysis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
- Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Dutch Cancer Society (KUN2007-3971)
- National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering of the National Institutes of Health
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
- Keywords
- prostate segmentation, prostate MRI, active appearance models, multi-atlas registration, level sets, segmentation algorithm comparison, prostate cancer, algorithm combination
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Humans, Image Enhancement, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Prostatic Neoplasms, Reference Standards, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Artifacts, Imaging, Three-Dimensional
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
