The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of prostate segmentation algorithms for MRI: The PROMISE12 challenge
Open accessAbstract
Prostate MRI image segmentation has been an area of intense research due to the increased use of MRI as a modality for the clinical workup of prostate cancer. Segmentation is useful for various tasks, e.g. to accurately localize prostate boundaries for radiotherapy or to initialize multi-modal registration algorithms. In the past, it has been difficult for research groups to evaluate prostate segmentation algorithms on multi-center, multi-vendor and multi-protocol data. Especially because we are dealing with MR images, image appearance, resolution and the presence of artifacts are affected by differences in scanners and/or protocols, which in turn can have a large influence on algorithm accuracy. The Prostate MR Image Segmentation (PROMISE12) challenge was setup to allow a fair and meaningful comparison of segmentation methods on the basis of performance and robustness. In this work we will discuss the initial results of the online PROMISE12 challenge, and the results obtained in the live challenge workshop hosted by the MICCAI2012 conference. In the challenge, 100 prostate MR cases from 4 different centers were included, with differences in scanner manufacturer, field strength and protocol. A total of 11 teams from academic research groups and industry participated. Algorithms showed a wide variety in methods and implementation, including active appearance models, atlas registration and level sets. Evaluation was performed using boundary and volume based metrics which were combined into a single score relating the metrics to human expert performance. The winners of the challenge where the algorithms by teams Imorphics and ScrAutoProstate, with scores of 85.72 and 84.29 overall. Both algorithms where significantly better than all other algorithms in the challenge (p<0.05) and had an efficient implementation with a run time of 8min and 3s per case respectively. Overall, active appearance model based approaches seemed to outperform other approaches like multi-atlas registration, both on accuracy and computation time. Although average algorithm performance was good to excellent and the Imorphics algorithm outperformed the second observer on average, we showed that algorithm combination might lead to further improvement, indicating that optimal performance for prostate segmentation is not yet obtained. All results are available online at http://promise12.grand-challenge.org/.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“PROMISE12 as the example in the prostate dataset is the dataset made for MICCAI prostate segmentation challenge, which was used by 11 academic teams for various segmentation algorithms and showed promising results”
From A review of deep learning-based deformable medical image registration (2022) · cites this paper as [55]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Robust Real-Time Face Detection
Viola, P., & Jones, M. J. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000013087.49260.fb · Cited by 14,097
Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm
Lorensen, W. E., & Cline, H. E. (1987) · ACM SIGGRAPH Conference (SIGGRAPH) · doi:10.1145/37401.37422 · Cited by 10,320
Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm
Lorensen, W. E., & Cline, H. E. (1987) · ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics · doi:10.1145/37402.37422 · Cited by 8,928
Cootes, T. F., Edwards, G. J., & Taylor, C. J. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.927467 · Cited by 5,409
ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012
Barentsz, J. O., Richenberg, J., Clements, R., Choyke, P. L., Verma, S., Villeirs, G. M., Rouvière, O., Løgager, V., & Fütterer, J. J. (2012) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2377-y · Cited by 2,444
Robust real-time object detection.
Viola, P. A. (2001) · Cited by 2,340
Warfield, S. K., Zou, K. H., & Wells, W. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2004.828354 · Cited by 2,072
Pérez, P., Gangnet, M., & Blake, A. (2003) · ACM SIGGRAPH Conference (SIGGRAPH) · doi:10.1145/1201775.882269 · Cited by 2,041
Pérez, P., Gangnet, M., & Blake, A. (2003) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/882262.882269 · Cited by 1,769
Comparison and evaluation of methods for liver segmentation from CT datasets
Heimann, T., van Ginneken, B., Styner, M. A., Arzhaeva, Y., Aurich, V., Bauer, C., Beck, A., Becker, C., Beichel, R., Bekes, G., et al. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2009.2013851 · Cited by 1,135
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Birkbeck, N., Zhang, J., Requardt, M., Kiefer, B., Gall, P., Kevin Zhou, S., 2012. Region-specific hierarchical segmentation of MR prostate using discriminative learning. MICCAI Grand Challenge: Prostate MR Image Segmentation 2012.
- Gao, Q., Rueckert, D., Edwards, P., 2012. An automatic multi-atlas based prostate segmentation using local appearance-specific atlases and patch-based voxel weighting. MICCAI Grand Challenge: Prostate MR Image Segmentation 2012.
- Ghose, S., Mitra, J., Oliver, A., Martí, R., Lladó, X., Freixenet, J., Vilanova, J.C., Sidibé, D., Meriaudeau, F., 2012. A random forest based classification approach to prostate segmentation in MRI. MICCAI Grand Challenge: Prostate MR Image Segmentation 2012.
- Kirschner, M., Jung, F., Wesarg, S., 2012. Automatic prostate segmentation in MR images with a probabilistic active shape model. MICCAI Grand Challenge: Prostate MR Image Segmentation 2012.
- Litjens, G.J.S., Karssemeijer, N., Huisman, H.J., 2012. A multi-atlas approach for prostate segmentation in MR images. MICCAI Grand Challenge: Prostate MR Image Segmentation 2012.
- Toth, 2012, Multifeature landmark-free active appearance models: application to prostate MRI segmentation, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 31, 1638, 10.1109/TMI.2012.2201498 · DOI
- Vincent, G., Guillard, G., Bowes, M., 2012. Fully automatic segmentation of the prostate using active appearance models. MICCAI Grand Challenge: Prostate MR Image Segmentation 2012.
- Yuan, J., Qiu, W., Ukwatta, E., Rajchl, M., Sun, Y., Fenster, A., 2012. An efficient convex optimization approach to 3D prostate MRI segmentation with generic star shape prior. MICCAI Grand Challenge: Prostate MR Image Segmentation 2012.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentation
Milletari, F., Navab, N., & Ahmadi, S.-A. (2016) · 2016 Fourth International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) · doi:10.1109/3dv.2016.79 · Cited by 11,931
nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation
Isensee, F., Jaeger, P. F., Kohl, S. A. A., Petersen, J., & Maier-Hein, K. H. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-01008-z · Cited by 10,477
Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool
Taha, A. A., & Hanbury, A. (2015) · BMC Medical Imaging · doi:10.1186/s12880-015-0068-x · Cited by 3,247
Medical image segmentation using deep learning: A survey
Wang, R., Lei, T., Cui, R., Zhang, B., Meng, H., & Nandi, A. K. (2022) · IET Image Processing · doi:10.1049/ipr2.12419 · Cited by 1,012
Yeung, M., Sala, E., Schönlieb, C., & Rundo, L. (2021) · Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2021.102026 · Cited by 795
Reducing the Hausdorff Distance in Medical Image Segmentation With Convolutional Neural Networks
Karimi, D., & Salcudean, S. E. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2019.2930068 · Cited by 656
Liu, Q., Chen, C., Qin, J., Dou, Q., & Heng, P. (2021) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00107 · Cited by 586
Zhang, L., Wang, X., Yang, D., Sanford, T., Harmon, S. A., Türkbey, B., Wood, B. J., Roth, H. R., Myronenko, A., Xu, D., et al. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2020.2973595 · Cited by 556
Segment anything model for medical images?
Huang, Y., Yang, X., Liu, L., Zhou, H., Chang, A., Zhou, X., Chen, R., Yu, J., Chen, J., Chen, C., et al. (2024) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2023.103061 · Cited by 536
“The authors of this paper sincerely appreciate all the challenge organizers and owners for providing the public MIS datasets including AbdomenCT-1K, ACDC, AMOS 2022, AutoLaparo,BrainPTM 2021, BraTS20,CAMUS, CHAOS, CHASE-DB1, Chest CT segmentation, CRAG, crossMoDA, CVC-ClinicDB,DRIVE, EndoTect 2020, EPFL-EM, ETIS-Larib…”
Maier, O., Menze, B. H., von der Gablentz, J., Häni, L., Heinrich, M. P., Liebrand, M., Winzeck, S., Basit, A., Bentley, P., Chen, L., et al. (2016) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.07.009 · Cited by 553
A new era: artificial intelligence and machine learning in prostate cancer
Goldenberg, S. L., Nir, G., & Salcudean, S. E. (2019) · Nature Reviews Urology · doi:10.1038/s41585-019-0193-3 · Cited by 536
Federated learning for medical image analysis: A survey
Guan, H., Yap, P.-T., Bozoki, A., & Liu, M. (2024) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2024.110424 · Cited by 518
Deep learning for image-based cancer detection and diagnosis − A survey
Hu, Z., Tang, J., Wang, Z., Zhang, K., Zhang, L., & Sun, Q. (2018) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2018.05.014 · Cited by 520
NAS-Unet: Neural Architecture Search for Medical Image Segmentation
Weng, Y., Zhou, T., Li, Y., & Qiu, X. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2908991 · Cited by 487
“On Promise12, NAS-Unet significantly outperforms the baseline methods.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCancer Diagnosis Using Deep Learning: A Bibliographic Review
Munir, K., Elahi, H., Ayub, A., Frezza, F., & Rizzi, A. (2019) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers11091235 · Cited by 437
Confidence calibration and predictive uncertainty estimation for deep medical image segmentation
Mehrtash, A., Wells, W. M., Tempany, C. M., Abolmaesumi, P., & Kapur, T. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2020.3006437 · Cited by 428
Why rankings of biomedical image analysis competitions should be interpreted with care
Maier‐Hein, L., Eisenmann, M., Reinke, A., Onogur, S., Stankovic, M., Godau, P., Arbel, T., Bogunović, H., Bradley, A. P., Carass, A., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07619-7 · Cited by 428
Jiao, R., Zhang, Y., Ding, L., Xue, B., Zhang, J., Cai, R., & Jin, C. (2023) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107840 · Cited by 374
Self-citationLemaître, G., Martí, R., Freixenet, J., Vilanova, J. C., WALKER, P. M., & Mériaudeau, F. (2015) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.02.009 · Cited by 363
Yu, L., Yang, X., Chen, H., Qin, J., & Heng, P. (2017) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10510 · Cited by 343
MS-Net: Multi-Site Network for Improving Prostate Segmentation With Heterogeneous MRI Data
Liu, Q., Dou, Q., Yu, L., & Heng, P. A. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2020.2974574 · Cited by 343
Annotation-efficient deep learning for automatic medical image segmentation
Wang, S., Li, C., Wang, R., Liu, Z., Wang, M., Tan, H., Wu, Y., Liu, X., Sun, H., Yang, R., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26216-9 · Cited by 343
A survey on U-shaped networks in medical image segmentations
Liu, L., Cheng, J., Quan, Q., Wu, F., Wang, Y., & Wang, J. (2020) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2020.05.070 · Cited by 290
Graph-Based Deep Learning for Medical Diagnosis and Analysis: Past, Present and Future
Ahmedt‐Aristizabal, D., Armin, M. A., Denman, S., Fookes, C., & Petersson, L. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21144758 · Cited by 298
ASDNet: Attention Based Semi-supervised Deep Networks for Medical Image Segmentation
Nie, D., Gao, Y., Wang, L., & Shen, D. G. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00937-3_43 · Cited by 273
Causality-Inspired Single-Source Domain Generalization for Medical Image Segmentation
Ouyang, C., Chen, C., Li, S., Li, Z., Qin, C., Bai, W., & Rueckert, D. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2022.3224067 · Cited by 291
Deep reinforcement learning in computer vision: a comprehensive survey
Le, N., Rathour, V. S., Yamazaki, K., Luu, K., & Savvides, M. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-021-10061-9 · Cited by 271
Shape-Aware Meta-learning for Generalizing Prostate MRI Segmentation to Unseen Domains
Liu, Q., Dou, Q., & Heng, P. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59713-9_46 · Cited by 247
MA-SAM: Modality-agnostic SAM adaptation for 3D medical image segmentation
Chen, C., Miao, J., Wu, D., Zhong, A., Yan, Z., Kim, S., Hu, J. J., Liu, Z., Sun, L., Li, X., et al. (2024) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2024.103310 · Cited by 293
Wang, K., Zhan, B., Zu, C., Wu, X., Zhou, J., Zhou, L., & Wang, Y. (2022) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2022.102447 · Cited by 210
Armato, S. G., Huisman, H. J., Drukker, K., Hadjiiski, L. M., Kirby, J., Petrick, N., Redmond, G., Giger, M. L., Cha, K., Mamonov, A. B., et al. (2018) · Journal of medical imaging · doi:10.1117/1.jmi.5.4.044501 · Cited by 196
Self-citationUniverSeg: Universal Medical Image Segmentation
Butoi, V. I., Gonzalez Ortiz, J. J., Ma, T., Sabuncu, M. R., Guttag, J., & Dalca, A. V. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01960 · Cited by 195
Wang, B., Lei, Y., Tian, S., Wang, T., Liu, Y., Patel, P. R., Jani, A. B., Mao, H. Z., Curran, W. J., Liu, T., et al. (2019) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.13416 · Cited by 198
Test-time adaptable neural networks for robust medical image segmentation
Karani, N., Erdil, E., Chaitanya, K., & Konukoğlu, E. (2020) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2020.101907 · Cited by 186
Deep Attentive Features for Prostate Segmentation in 3D Transrectal Ultrasound
Wang, Y., Ni, D., Dou, H., Hu, X., Zhu, L., Yang, X., Xu, M., Qin, J., Heng, P.-A., & Wang, T. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2019.2913184 · Cited by 188
HarmoFL: Harmonizing Local and Global Drifts in Federated Learning on Heterogeneous Medical Images
Jiang, M., Wang, Z.-R., & Dou, Q. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i1.19993 · Cited by 174
A review of uncertainty estimation and its application in medical imaging
Zou, K., Chen, Z., Yuan, X., Shen, X., Wang, M., & Fu, H. (2023) · Meta-Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.metrad.2023.100003 · Cited by 199
Tătaru, O. S., Vartolomei, M. D., Rassweiler, J. J., Osan, V. G., Lucarelli, G. T., Porpiglia, F., Amparore, D., Manfredi, M., Carrieri, G., Falagario, U. G., et al. (2021) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics11020354 · Cited by 171
Jiménez–del–Toro, O. A., Müller, H., Krenn, M., Gruenberg, K., Taha, A. A., Winterstein, M., Eggel, I., Foncubierta–Rodríguez, A., Göksel, O., András, J., et al. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2578680 · Cited by 165
Self-citationAdvantages of transformer and its application for medical image segmentation: a survey
Pu, Q., Xi, Z., Yin, S., Zhao, Z., & Zhao, L. (2024) · BioMedical Engineering OnLine · doi:10.1186/s12938-024-01212-4 · Cited by 157
Medical image segmentation with 3D convolutional neural networks: A survey
Niyas, S., Pawan, S. J., Kumar, M. A., & Rajan, J. (2022) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2022.04.065 · Cited by 150
Superpixel-Based Segmentation for 3D Prostate MR Images
Tian, Z., Liu, L., Zhang, Z., & Fei, B. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2015.2496296 · Cited by 148
nnU-Net: Breaking the Spell on Successful Medical Image Segmentation.Preprint
Isensee, F., Petersen, J., Köhl, S., Jäger, P. F., & Maier-Hein, K. H. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 144
C-CAM: Causal CAM for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation on Medical Image
Chen, Z., Tian, Z., Zhu, J., Li, C., & Du, S. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01138 · Cited by 147
AdaEn-Net: An ensemble of adaptive 2D–3D Fully Convolutional Networks for medical image segmentation
Baldeon-Calisto, M., & Lai-Yuen, S. K. (2020) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2020.03.007 · Cited by 140
Source free domain adaptation for medical image segmentation with fourier style mining
Yang, C., Guo, X., Chen, Z., & Yuan, Y. (2022) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2022.102457 · Cited by 148
Federated learning for healthcare applications
Chaddad, A., Wu, Y., & Desrosiers, C. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3325822 · Cited by 136
AdaResU-Net: Multiobjective adaptive convolutional neural network for medical image segmentation
Baldeon-Calisto, M., & Lai-Yuen, S. K. (2019) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2019.01.110 · Cited by 136
CASF-Net: Cross-attention and cross-scale fusion network for medical image segmentation
Zheng, J., Liu, H., Feng, Y., Xu, J., & Zhao, L. (2022) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107307 · Cited by 126
Recent progress in transformer-based medical image analysis
Liu, Z., Lv, Q., Yang, Z., Li, Y., Lee, C. H., & Shen, L. (2023) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107268 · Cited by 133
Ma, C., & Wang, Z. (2024) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2024.112203 · Cited by 124
Adaptive Bidirectional Displacement for Semi-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation
Chi, H., Pang, J., Zhang, B., & Liu, W. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.00390 · Cited by 122
Wang, S., Burtt, K. E., Türkbey, B., Choyke, P. L., & Summers, R. M. (2014) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2014/789561 · Cited by 121
Elguindi, S., Zeléfsky, M. J., Jiang, J., Veeraraghavan, H., Deasy, J. O., Hunt, M. A., & Tyagi, N. (2019) · Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.phro.2019.11.006 · Cited by 122
Multiparametric MRI and radiomics in prostate cancer: a review
Yu, S. Y., Reynolds, H. M., Parameswaran, B. K., Wraith, D., Finnegan, M. E., Williams, S., & Haworth, A. (2019) · Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13246-019-00730-z · Cited by 116
Jia, H., Xia, Y., Song, Y., Zhang, D., Huang, H., Zhang, Y., & Cai, W. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2019.2928056 · Cited by 116
Hu, S., Liao, Z., Zhang, J., & Xia, Y. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2022.3210133 · Cited by 118
Self-citationBayeSeg: Bayesian modeling for medical image segmentation with interpretable generalizability
Gao, S., Zhou, H., Gao, Y., & Zhuang, X. (2023) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2023.102889 · Cited by 121
Nyholm, T., Svensson, S., Andersson, S., Jonsson, J., Sohlin, M., Gustafsson, C., Kjellén, E., Söderström, K., Albertsson, P., Blomqvist, L., et al. (2018) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.12748 · Cited by 104
Dual Focal Loss to address class imbalance in semantic segmentation
Hossain, M. S., Betts, J. M., & Papliński, A. P. (2021) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2021.07.055 · Cited by 112
Sammouda, R., & El‐Zaart, A. (2021) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2021/4553832 · Cited by 110
A review on the use of deep learning for medical images segmentation
Aljabri, M., & Alghamdi, M. (2022) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2022.07.070 · Cited by 113
PSNet: prostate segmentation on MRI based on a convolutional neural network
Tian, Z., Liu, L., Zhang, Z., & Fei, B. (2018) · Journal of medical imaging · doi:10.1117/1.jmi.5.2.021208 · Cited by 110
Multi-Site Infant Brain Segmentation Algorithms: The iSeg-2019 Challenge
Sun, Y., Gao, K., Wu, Z., Li, G., Zong, X., Lei, Z., Wei, Y. J., Ma, J., Yang, X., Feng, X., et al. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2021.3055428 · Cited by 106
PSP net-based automatic segmentation network model for prostate magnetic resonance imaging
Yan, L., Liu, D., Xiang, Q., Luo, Y., Wang, T., Wu, D., Chen, H., Zhang, Y., & Li, Q. (2021) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106211 · Cited by 112
DeSAM: Decoupled Segment Anything Model for Generalizable Medical Image Segmentation
Gao, Y., Xia, W., Hu, D., Wang, W., & Gao, X. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72390-2_48 · Cited by 123
Alarcón-Zendejas, A. P., Scavuzzo, A., Jiménez-Ríos, M. Á., Álvarez-Gómez, R. M., Montiel-Manríquez, R., Hernández, C. C., Jiménez-Dávila, M. A., Pérez‐Montiel, D., González‐Barrios, R., Jiménez-Trejo, F. J., et al. (2022) · Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases · doi:10.1038/s41391-022-00537-2 · Cited by 98
Prostate158 - An expert-annotated 3T MRI dataset and algorithm for prostate cancer detection
Adams, L. C., Makowski, M. R., Engel, G., Rattunde, M., Busch, F., Asbach, P., Niehues, S. M., Vinayahalingam, S., van Ginneken, B., Litjens, G. J. S., et al. (2022) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105817 · Cited by 98
Self-citationPersonalized Retrogress-Resilient Federated Learning Toward Imbalanced Medical Data
Chen, Z., Yang, C., Zhu, M., Peng, Z., & Yuan, Y. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2022.3192483 · Cited by 98
Federated Semi-Supervised Learning for Medical Image Segmentation via Pseudo-Label Denoising
Qiu, L., Cheng, J., Gao, H., Xiong, W., & Ren, H. (2023) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2023.3274498 · Cited by 98
Segment Anything Model (SAM) for Medical Image Segmentation: A Preliminary Review
Zhang, L., Deng, X., & Yu, L. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm58861.2023.10386032 · Cited by 103
Tripled-Uncertainty Guided Mean Teacher Model for Semi-supervised Medical Image Segmentation
Wang, K., Zhan, B., Zu, C., Wu, X., Zhou, J., Zhou, L., & Wang, Y. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87196-3_42 · Cited by 97
Data synthesis and adversarial networks: A review and meta-analysis in cancer imaging
Osuala, R. O., Kushibar, K., Garrucho, L., Linardos, A., Szafranowska, Z., Klein, S., Glocker, B., Díaz, O., & Lekadir, K. (2022) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2022.102704 · Cited by 106
Karimi, D., Samei, G., Kesch, C. V., Nir, G., & Salcudean, S. E. (2018) · International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11548-018-1785-8 · Cited by 93
Deep Learning-Based Methods for Prostate Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Comelli, A., Dahiya, N., Stefano, A., Vernuccio, F., Portoghese, M., Cutaia, G., Bruno, A., Salvaggio, G., & Yezzi, A. J. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11020782 · Cited by 93
A review of deep learning-based deformable medical image registration
Zou, J., Gao, B., Song, Y., & Qin, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.1047215 · Cited by 91
“Frontiers in Oncology 04 which was used by 11 academic teams for various segmentation algorithms and showed promising results (55).”
BackgroundInfluentialAutomatic Segmentation of the Prostate on CT Images Using Deep Neural Networks (DNN)
Liu, C., Gardner, S. J., Wen, N. W., Elshaikh, M. A., Siddiqui, F., Movsas, B., & Chetty, I. J. (2019) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.017 · Cited by 89
Orlando, N., Gillies, D. J., Gyacskov, I., Romagnoli, C., D'Souza, D. P., & Fenster, A. (2020) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.14134 · Cited by 90
A review of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection on imaging
Bhattacharya, I., Khandwala, Y. S., Vesal, S., Shao, W., Yang, Q., Soerensen, S. J. C., Fan, R. E., Ghanouni, P., Kunder, C. A., Brooks, J. D., et al. (2022) · Therapeutic Advances in Urology · doi:10.1177/17562872221128791 · Cited by 97
Kumari, S., & Singh, P. P. (2023) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107912 · Cited by 97
Jia, H., Xia, Y., Song, Y., Cai, W., FULHAM, M. J., & Feng, D. D. (2017) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2017.09.084 · Cited by 86
Adversarial Deformation Regularization for Training Image Registration Neural Networks
Hu, Y., Gibson, E., Ghavami, N., Bonmati, E., Moore, C. M., Emberton, M., Vercauteren, T. K., Noble, J. A., & Barratt, D. C. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00928-1_87 · Cited by 85
Self-citationSegmentation of Liver Tumor in CT Scan Using ResU-Net
Sabir, M. W., Khan, Z., Saad, M. N. M., Khan, D. M., Al‐Khasawneh, M. A., Perveen, K., Qayyum, A., & Ali, S. S. A. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12178650 · Cited by 84
Clark, T., Zhang, J., Baig, S., Wong, A. K. C., Haider, M. A., & Khalvati, F. (2017) · Journal of medical imaging · doi:10.1117/1.jmi.4.4.041307 · Cited by 83
Self-citationDeb, D., & Roy, S. S. (2020) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-020-09810-9 · Cited by 82
Large-vocabulary segmentation for medical images with text prompts
Zhao, Z., Zhang, Y., Wu, C., Zhang, X., Zhou, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., & Xie, W. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01964-w · Cited by 123
Incremental Learning Meets Transfer Learning: Application to Multi-site Prostate MRI Segmentation
You, C., Xiang, J., Su, K., Zhang, X., Dong, S., Onofrey, J. A., Staib, L. H., & Duncan, J. S. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-18523-6_1 · Cited by 80
Fair Federated Medical Image Segmentation via Client Contribution Estimation
Jiang, M., Roth, H. R., Li, W., Yang, D. L., Zhao, C. H., Nath, V., Xu, D., Dou, Q., & Xu, Z. (2023) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01564 · Cited by 86
Early cancer detection using deep learning and medical imaging: A survey
Ahmad, I., & Alqurashi, F. A. (2024) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104528 · Cited by 79
TFCNs: A CNN-Transformer Hybrid Network for Medical Image Segmentation
Li, Z., Li, D., Xu, C., Wang, W., Hong, Q., Li, Q., & Tian, J. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-15937-4_65 · Cited by 80
Kuang, H., Menon, B. K., Sohn, S. I., & Qiu, W. (2021) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2021.101984 · Cited by 77
Self-citationA review of deep learning-based three-dimensional medical image registration methods
Xiao, H., Teng, X., Liu, C., Li, T., Ren, G., Yang, R., Shen, D., & Cai, J. (2021) · Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.21037/qims-21-175 · Cited by 77
IOP-FL: Inside-Outside Personalization for Federated Medical Image Segmentation
Jiang, M., Yang, H., Chen, C., & Dou, Q. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2023.3263072 · Cited by 83
Sunoqrot, M. R. S., Saha, A., Hosseinzadeh, M., Elschot, M., & Huisman, H. (2022) · European Radiology Experimental · doi:10.1186/s41747-022-00288-8 · Cited by 76
Self-citationRecent Automatic Segmentation Algorithms of MRI Prostate Regions: A Review
Khan, Z., Yahya, N., Alsaih, K., Al-Hiyali, M. I., & Mériaudeau, F. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3090825 · Cited by 78
Fu, Y., Lei, Y., Wang, T., Patel, P., Jani, A. B., Mao, H., Curran, W. J., Liu, T., & Yang, X. (2021) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2020.101845 · Cited by 75
Unleashing the Potential of SAM for Medical Adaptation via Hierarchical Decoding
Cheng, Z., Wei, Q., Zhu, H., Wang, Y., Qu, L., Shao, W., & Zhou, Y. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.00337 · Cited by 86
Machine learning in prostate MRI for prostate cancer: current status and future opportunities
Li, H., Lee, C. H., Chia, D., Lin, Z., Huang, W., & Tan, C. H. (2022) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics12020289 · Cited by 74
Ghavami, N., Hu, Y., Gibson, E., Bonmati, E., Emberton, M., Moore, C. M., & Barratt, D. C. (2019) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2019.101558 · Cited by 74
Self-citationCheng, R., Roth, H. R., Lay, N. S., Lü, L., Türkbey, B., Gandler, W., McCreedy, E. S., Pohida, T., Pinto, P. A., Choyke, P. L., et al. (2017) · Journal of medical imaging · doi:10.1117/1.jmi.4.4.041302 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Litjens, G., Toth, R., van de Ven, W., Hoeks, C., Kerkstra, S., van Ginneken, B., Vincent, G., Guillard, G., Birbeck, N., Zhang, J., Strand, R., Malmberg, F., Ou, Y., Davatzikos, C., Kirschner, M., Jung, F., Yuan, J., Qiu, W., Gao, Q., Edwards, P. “., Maan, B., van der Heijden, F., Ghose, S., Mitra, J., Dowling, J., Barratt, D., Huisman, H., & Madabhushi, A.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
- Siemens (United States) (US)
- Uppsala University (SE)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
- Robarts Research Institute (CA)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- University of Twente (NL)
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- University College London (GB)
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Litjens, Geert
- ORCID
- Venue
- Medical Image Analysis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 359-373
- ISSN
- 1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4137968
- OpenAlex
- W2106033751
- Cited by
- 857
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 107 · 2025: 127 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 106 · 2022: 92 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 10
- FWCI
- 19.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Medical Image Analysis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
- Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Dutch Cancer Society (KUN2007-3971)
- National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering of the National Institutes of Health
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
- Keywords
- prostate segmentation, prostate MRI, active appearance models, multi-atlas registration, level sets, segmentation algorithm comparison, prostate cancer, algorithm combination
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Humans, Image Enhancement, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Prostatic Neoplasms, Reference Standards, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Artifacts, Imaging, Three-Dimensional
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
