Cited by 43Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationUltrasound in Clinical Applications

Automated ultrasound assessment of amniotic fluid index using deep learning

Open access
Cho, Hyun Cheol, Sun, Siyu, Min Hyun, Chang, Kwon, Ja-Young, Kim, Bukweon, Park, Yejin, Seo, Jin Keun·2021·Medical Image Analysis

Abstract

The estimation of antenatal amniotic fluid (AF) volume (AFV) is important as it offers crucial information about fetal development, fetal well-being, and perinatal prognosis. However, AFV measurement is cumbersome and patient specific. Moreover, it is heavily sonographer-dependent, with measurement accuracy varying greatly depending on the sonographer's experience. Therefore, the development of accurate, robust, and adoptable methods to evaluate AFV is highly desirable. In this regard, automation is expected to reduce user-based variability and workload of sonographers. However, automating AFV measurement is very challenging, because accurate detection of AF pockets is difficult owing to various confusing factors, such as reverberation artifact, AF mimicking region and floating matter. Furthermore, AF pocket exhibits an unspecified variety of shapes and sizes, and ultrasound images often show missing or incomplete structural boundaries. To overcome the abovementioned difficulties, we develop a hierarchical deep-learning-based method, which consider clinicians' anatomical-knowledge-based approaches. The key step is the segmentation of the AF pocket using our proposed deep learning network, AF-net. AF-net is a variation of U-net combined with three complementary concepts - atrous convolution, multi-scale side-input layer, and side-output layer. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method provides a measurement of the amniotic fluid index (AFI) that is as robust and precise as the results from clinicians. The proposed method achieved a Dice similarity of 0.877±0.086 for AF segmentation and achieved a mean absolute error of 2.666±2.986 and mean relative error of 0.018±0.023 for AFI value. To the best of our knowledge, our method, for the first time, provides an automated measurement of AFI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.media.2020.101951

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Norton, M. , 2016. Callen's Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology, sixth ed. Elsevier .
  2. of ObstetriciansA.C., Gynecologists , 2014. Practice bulletin no. 145: antepartum fetal surveillance. Obstet. Gynecol. 124 (145), 182-192 .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cho, H. C., Sun, S., Min Hyun, C., Kwon, J.-Y., Kim, B., Park, Y., & Seo, J. K.
Affiliations
Yonsei University (KR)
Corresponding author
Park, Yejin
Venue
Medical Image Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
69
Pages
101951
ISSN
1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3027793520
Cited by
43
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Image Analysis (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Keywords
amniotic fluid index, amniotic fluid volume, dilated convolution, U-Net, fetal well-being, reverberation artifact
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Amniotic Fluid, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Ultrasonography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review