Cited by 19Ovarian function and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsEndometriosis Research and Treatment

Randomized controlled trial of the effects of metformin versus combined oral contraceptives in adolescent PCOS women through a 24month follow up period

Open access
El Maghraby, H.A., Nafee, T., Guiziry, D., Elnashar, A.·2015·Middle East Fertility Society Journal

Abstract

Objective: To compare metformin and combined oral contraceptive pill (COC) effects over 24 months in adolescent PCOS. Design: Randomized controlled study. Setting: Alexandria ICSI centre. Patients: 117 adolescent girls with PCOS, were randomized to: group A (n = 40): metformin, group B (n = 40): COC, and group C (n = 39): control. Interventions: Group A: received metformin, group B: received combined oral contraceptives. Main outcome measures: Improvement in cycle rhythm and hirsutism. Results: In group B a significant decline in serum testosterone reached the lowest value by the end of the second year (0.7 ± 0.2 versus 1.3 ± 0.5 μg/ml). By the end of the study, group A showed a significant decline in fasting (18.6 ± 3.0–10.0 ± 3.0 μIU/ml) and after-load insulin levels (126 ± 43–64 ± 15 μIU/ml) with a significant rise in glucose/insulin ratio (GIR) from 4.1 ± 0.3 to 4.6 ± 0.5. Group B showed a significant rise in fasting and after-load insulin (from 15.0 ± 3.0 μIU/ml and 103.0 ± 91.0 μIU/ml to 19.0 ± 4.0 and 187.0 ± 22.0 μIU/ml, respectively) and GIR dropped significantly from 4.4 ± 0.2 to 3.1 ± 0.3. Metformin was associated with a significant loss of weight from 87.0 ± 6.0 to 72.0 ± 0.5 kg while COC was associated with a non-significant gain in weight (from 84.0 ± 6.0 to 91.0 ± 9.0 kg). Conclusions: Metformin and COC have comparable therapeutic effectiveness on cycle regularity and hirsutism. Metformin was associated with a significant improvement in metabolic syndrome, while COC was associated with a deterioration of metabolic syndrome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mefs.2014.10.003

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple observational studies and six RCTs evaluating the effect of metformin on a total of 275 adolescents with PCOS have demonstrated short-term beneficial effects mostly in adolescents with overweight/obesity.

    “There have been multiple observational studies and six RCTs evaluating the effect of metformin on a total of 275 adolescents with PCOS. These studies have demonstrated short-term beneficial effects mostly in adolescents with overweight/obesity [164, 180–183].”
  • COCPs are associated with improvement in menstrual irregularity and acne according to a meta-analysis of metformin vs oral contraceptives in adolescents with PCOS.

    “Metformin at a dose of 1700 to 2000 mg/d is associated with greater improvement of BMI, and COCPs are associated with improvement in menstrual irregularity and acne according to a meta-analysis of metformin vs oral contraceptives in adolescents with PCOS and including four RCTs (170 adolescents) [164, 180–184].”
  • COCPs improve menstrual irregularity in adolescents with PCOS.

    “COCPs improve menstrual irregularity in adolescents with PCOS [164, 180–184].”
  • Metformin at a dose of 1700 to 2000 mg/d is associated with greater improvement of BMI according to a meta-analysis of metformin vs oral contraceptives in adolescents with PCOS and including four RCTs (170 adolescents).

    “Metformin at a dose of 1700 to 2000 mg/d is associated with greater improvement of BMI, and COCPs are associated with improvement in menstrual irregularity and acne according to a meta-analysis of metformin vs oral contraceptives in adolescents with PCOS and including four RCTs (170 adolescents) [164, 180–184].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
El Maghraby, H. A., Nafee, T., Guiziry, D., & Elnashar, A.
Affiliations
  • Keele University (GB)
  • Alexandria University (EG)
  • Benha University (EG)
Corresponding author
Elnashar, A.
Venue
Middle East Fertility Society Journal
Published
2015-09
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
131-137
ISSN
1110-5690 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053834636
Cited by
19
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Middle East Fertility Society Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, adolescent girls, metformin, combined oral contraceptives, menstrual cycle regularity, hirsutism, insulin resistance, glucose/insulin ratio, serum testosterone, weight change, metabolic syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review