Cited by 574Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlNeuroscience of respiration and sleepVagus Nerve Stimulation Research

Physiology of long pranayamic breathing: neural respiratory elements may provide a mechanism that explains how slow deep breathing shifts the autonomic nervous system.

Open access
Jerath, Ravinder, Edry, John W., Barnes, Vernon A., Jerath, Vandna·2006·Medical Hypotheses

Abstract

Pranayamic breathing, defined as a manipulation of breath movement, has been shown to contribute to a physiologic response characterized by the presence of decreased oxygen consumption, decreased heart rate, and decreased blood pressure, as well as increased theta wave amplitude in EEG recordings, increased parasympathetic activity accompanied by the experience of alertness and reinvigoration. The mechanism of how pranayamic breathing interacts with the nervous system affecting metabolism and autonomic functions remains to be clearly understood. It is our hypothesis that voluntary slow deep breathing functionally resets the autonomic nervous system through stretch-induced inhibitory signals and hyperpolarization currents propagated through both neural and non-neural tissue which synchronizes neural elements in the heart, lungs, limbic system and cortex. During inspiration, stretching of lung tissue produces inhibitory signals by action of slowly adapting stretch receptors (SARs) and hyperpolarization current by action of fibroblasts. Both inhibitory impulses and hyperpolarization current are known to synchronize neural elements leading to the modulation of the nervous system and decreased metabolic activity indicative of the parasympathetic state. In this paper we propose pranayama's physiologic mechanism through a cellular and systems level perspective, involving both neural and non-neural elements. This theoretical description describes a common physiological mechanism underlying pranayama and elucidate the role of the respiratory and cardiovascular system on modulating the autonomic nervous system. Along with facilitating the design of clinical breathing techniques for the treatment of autonomic nervous system and other disorders, this model will also validate pranayama as a topic requiring more research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.02.042

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jerath, R., Edry, J. W., Barnes, V. A., & Jerath, V.
Affiliations
Augusta University (US)
Corresponding author
Jerath, Ravinder
Venue
Medical Hypotheses
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
67
Issue
3
Pages
566-571
ISSN
0306-9877 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013681051
Cited by
574
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 20
FWCI
4.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Hypotheses (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Keywords
pranayama, slow deep breathing, autonomic nervous system, parasympathetic activity, slowly adapting receptors, neuronal synchronization
MeSH terms
Autonomic Nervous System, Breathing Exercises, Humans, Models, Biological, Respiration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review