The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Basis for Specific Recognition of Bacterial Ligands by NAIP/NLRC4 Inflammasomes
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY NLR (nucleotide-binding domain [NBD]- and leucine-rich repeat [LRR]-containing) proteins mediate innate immune sensing of pathogens in mammals and plants. How NLRs detect their cognate stimuli remains poorly understood. Here, we analyzed ligand recognition by NAIP (NLR Apoptosis Inhibitory Protein) inflammasomes. Mice express multiple highly related NAIP paralogs that recognize distinct bacterial proteins. We analyzed a panel of 43 chimeric NAIPs, allowing us to map the NAIP domain responsible for specific ligand detection. Surprisingly, ligand specificity was mediated not by the LRR domain, but by an internal region encompassing several NBD-associated α-helical domains. Interestingly, we find that the ligand specificity domain has evolved under positive selection in both rodents and primates. We further show that ligand binding is required for the subsequent co-oligomerization of NAIPs with the downstream signaling adaptor NLRC4 (NLR family, CARD-containing 4). These data provide a molecular basis for how NLRs detect ligands and assemble into inflammasomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jones, J. D. G., & Dangl, J. L. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05286 · Cited by 13,177
Martinon, F., Burns, K., & Tschopp, J. (2002) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00599-3 · Cited by 6,066
Host-Microbe Interactions: Shaping the Evolution of the Plant Immune Response
Chisholm, S. T., Coaker, G., Day, B., & Staskawicz, B. J. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.008 · Cited by 2,957
Rules of engagement: molecular insights from host–virus arms races
Daugherty, M. D., & Malik, H. S. (2012) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155522 · Cited by 515
Self-citation
Cited by
Inflammasomes: mechanism of assembly, regulation and signalling
Broz, P., & Dixit, V. M. (2016) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri.2016.58 · Cited by 3,500
Inflammasomes: mechanism of action, role in disease, and therapeutics
Guo, H., Callaway, J. B., & Ting, J. P.-Y. (2015) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3893 · Cited by 3,340
Pyroptotic cell death defends against intracellular pathogens
Jorgensen, I., & Miao, E. A. (2015) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/imr.12287 · Cited by 1,021
Salmonellae interactions with host processes
LaRock, D. L., Chaudhary, A., & Miller, S. I. (2015) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3420 · Cited by 502
Mechanisms of inflammasome activation: recent advances and novel insights
Vanaja, S. K., Rathinam, V. A. K., & Fitzgerald, K. A. (2015) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2014.12.009 · Cited by 499
Metadata
- Authors
- Tenthorey, J. L., Kofoed, E. M., Daugherty, M. D., Malik, H. S., & Vance, R. E.
- Venue
- Molecular Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-29
- ISSN
- 1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034230597
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Basis for Specific Recognition of Bacterial Ligands by NAIP/NLRC4 Inflammasomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.molcel.2014.02.018
- The paper
- Tenthorey, J. L., Kofoed, E. M., Daugherty, M. D., Malik, H. S., & Vance, R. E. (2014). Molecular Basis for Specific Recognition of Bacterial Ligands by NAIP/NLRC4 Inflammasomes. Molecular Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2014.02.018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
