Cited by 531Epigenetics and DNA MethylationRNA modifications and cancerDNA Repair Mechanisms

N6-Methyladenine DNA Modification in the Human Genome

Open access
Xiao, Chuan-Le, Zhu, Song, He, Minghui, Chen, De, Zhang, Qian, Chen, Ying, Yu, Guoliang, Liu, Jinbao +8 more·2018·Molecular Cell

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

DNA N 6-methyladenine (6mA) modification is the most prevalent DNA modification in prokaryotes, but whether it exists in human cells and whether it plays a role in human diseases remain enigmatic. Here, we showed that 6mA is extensively present in the human genome, and we cataloged 881,240 6mA sites accounting for ∼0.051% of the total adenines. [G/C]AGG[C/T] was the most significantly associated motif with 6mA modification. 6mA sites were enriched in the coding regions and mark actively transcribed genes in human cells. DNA 6mA and N 6-demethyladenine modification in the human genome were mediated by methyltransferase N6AMT1 and demethylase ALKBH1, respectively. The abundance of 6mA was significantly lower in cancers, accompanied by decreased N6AMT1 and increased ALKBH1 levels, and downregulation of 6mA modification levels promoted tumorigenesis. Collectively, our results demonstrate that DNA 6mA modification is extensively present in human cells and the decrease of genomic DNA 6mA promotes human tumorigenesis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.06.015

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reported differences in 6mA distribution between mouse and human may represent tissue-specific patterns rather than species differences, because the tissues used were unique to each species.

    “Reported difference in 6mA distribution between mouse and human may represent tissue specific patterns rather than species differences, since the tissues used for the mouse and human studies were unique to each species (mESC and blood DNA, respectively (60, 61)).”
  • These findings are supported by the identification of both a methyltransferase and a demethylase for deposition and removal of 6mA.

    “These findings are supported by the identification of both methyltransferase and demethylase for deposition and removal of 6mA, respectively (60, 61).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xiao, C.-L., Zhu, S., He, M., Chen, D., Zhang, Q., Chen, Y., Yu, G., Liu, J., Xie, S.-Q., Luo, F., Liang, Z., Wang, D.-P., Bo, X.-C., Gu, X.-F., Wang, K., & Yan, G.-R.
Affiliations
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
  • Grandomics (China) (CN)
  • Guangzhou Medical University (CN)
  • Clemson University (US)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Kai
  • Yan, Guang-Rong
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
71
Issue
2
Pages
306-318.e7
ISSN
1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2949348780
Cited by
531
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 18 · 2016: 1
FWCI
21.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Cell (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81772998, 81672393)
  • R&D Plan of Guangzhou and Guangdong (201704020115, 2017A020215096)
  • Yangcheng Scholars program from the Ministry of Education of Guangzhou (1201561583)
  • Innovative Research Team of Ministry of Education of Guangzhou (1201610015)
  • National Funds of Developing Local Colleges and Universities (B16056001)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (15ykjc23d)
  • Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (2015A030313127)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M612798)
  • NIH (HG006465)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA modifications and cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
Keywords
N6-methyladenosine, DNA methylation, ALKBH1, demethylases, methyltransferase, carcinogenesis, cancer, human genome, DNA modification
MeSH terms
AlkB Homolog 1, Histone H2a Dioxygenase, Adenine, Animals, DNA, Humans, Mice, Nude, Site-Specific DNA-Methyltransferase (Adenine-Specific), Genome, Human, DNA Methylation, Mice, Carcinogenesis, Heterografts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review