Cited by 170Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismHemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience

The connectivity of the superior longitudinal fasciculus: A tractography DTI study

Bernal, Byron, Altman, Nolan·2010·Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract

Purpose The left superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) has been felt to link receptive with expressive language areas. The latter is located in the pars opercularis (Broca's area) of the left inferior frontal gyrus. We report the findings with tractography of the SLF in a group of normal volunteers. Methods and materials The data and subsidiary results of 12 normal right-handed volunteers who participated in an institutional review board-approved diffusion tensor imaging study were evaluated. The SLF fibers were obtained bilaterally placing a region of interest at the triangular-shaped region lateral to each of the corticospinal tracts, in a coronal plane along the rostral aspect of the corpus callosum. A sagittal fractional anisotropy image was used to determine the rostral endpoint of the SLF fibers in the white matter pertaining to specific gyri or pars of the frontal lobe. The SLF projection to Broca's area was ranked qualitatively as none, minimal, most or all. Findings are presented in descriptive statistics. Results The SLF projection to Broca's areas was absent in seven subjects (58.3%) and minimal in five (41.6%). SLF's rostral end points were found uniquely or mainly in the precentral gyrus in 100% of cases. Conclusion The SLF was found connecting the posterior language areas to the precentral gyrus and only marginally in some cases to the canonical Broca's area. This finding is consistent with reports describing lack of correlation between lateralization of the SL…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mri.2009.07.008

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bernal, B., & Altman, N.
Affiliations
Miami Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Bernal, Byron
Venue
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
217-225
ISSN
0730-725X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998546834
Cited by
170
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Keywords
superior longitudinal fasciculus, Broca's area, precentral gyrus, white matter connectivity, tractography, diffusion tensor imaging, fractional anisotropy, corpus callosum, inferior frontal gyrus
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Male, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Diffusion Tensor Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review