Cited by 89Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsMedical and Biological SciencesFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Subcortical anatomy of the lateral association fascicles of the brain: A review

Martino, Juan, De Lucas, Enrique Marco·2014·Clinical Anatomy

Abstract

Precise knowledge of the connectivities of the different white matter bundles is of great value for neuroscience research. Our knowledge of subcortical anatomy has improved exponentially during recent decades owing to the development of magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging tractography (DTI). Although DTI tractography has led to important progress in understanding white matter anatomy, the precise trajectory and cortical connections of the subcortical bundles remain poorly determined. The recent literature was extensively reviewed in order to analyze the trajectories and cortical terminations of the lateral association fibers of the brain.The anatomy of the following tracts is reviewed: superior longitudinal fasciculus, middle longitudinal fasciculus, inferior longitudinal fasciculus, inferior fronto‐occipital fasciculus, uncinate fasciculus, frontal aslant tract, and vertical occipital fasciculus. The functional role of a tract can be inferred from its topography within the brain. Knowing the functional roles of the cortical areas connected by a certain bundle, it is possible to develop new insights into the putative functional properties of such connections. Clin. Anat. 563–569, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ca.22321

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martino, J., & De Lucas, E. M.
Affiliations
  • Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital (ES)
  • Department of Neuroradiology Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla and Instituto de Formación e Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IFIMAV) Avda, Valdecilla s/n Santander Cantabria Spain
Corresponding author
Martino, Juan
Venue
Clinical Anatomy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-01-22
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
563-569
ISSN
  • 0897-3806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2353
OpenAlex
W1551553872
Cited by
89
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Anatomy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fundaci�n Marqu�s de Valdecilla (API 11/18)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Medical and Biological Sciences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
superior longitudinal fasciculus, middle longitudinal fasciculus, inferior longitudinal fasciculus, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, uncinate fasciculus, frontal aslant tract, tractography, white matter connectivity, cortical connectivity
MeSH terms
Brain, Humans, Nerve Fibers, Myelinated

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review