Cited by 19Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesAdvanced NMR Techniques and Applications

Comparative quantification of dietary supplemented neural creatine concentrations with 1H-MRS peak fitting and basis spectrum methods

Turner, Clare E., Russell, Bruce R., Gant, Nicholas·2015·Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is an analytical procedure that can be used to non-invasively measure the concentration of a range of neural metabolites. Creatine is an important neurometabolite with dietary supplementation offering therapeutic potential for neurological disorders with dysfunctional energetic processes. Neural creatine concentrations can be probed using proton MRS and quantified using a range of software packages based on different analytical methods. This experiment examines the differences in quantification performance of two commonly used analysis packages following a creatine supplementation strategy with potential therapeutic application. Human participants followed a seven day dietary supplementation regime in a placebo-controlled, cross-over design interspersed with a five week wash-out period. Spectroscopy data were acquired the day immediately following supplementation and analyzed with two commonly-used software packages which employ vastly different quantification methods. Results demonstrate that neural creatine concentration was augmented following creatine supplementation when analyzed using the peak fitting method of quantification (105.9%±10.1). In contrast, no change in neural creatine levels were detected with supplementation when analysis was conducted using the basis spectrum method of quantification (102.6%±8.6). Results suggest that software packages that employ the peak fitting procedure for spectral quantification are possibly mo…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mri.2015.06.018

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Turner, C. E., Russell, B. R., & Gant, N.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Gant, Nicholas
Venue
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
33
Issue
9
Pages
1163-1167
ISSN
0730-725X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1414769819
Cited by
19
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Auckland
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Keywords
creatine supplementation, 1H NMR, spectral quantification, peak fitting, software comparison, neurometabolites, dietary supplementation, neurological disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Creatine, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Middle Aged, Cross-Over Studies, Dietary Supplements, Young Adult, Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review