Cited by 13Endodontics and Root Canal TreatmentsBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsPeriodontal Regeneration and Treatments

Polydopamine-coated bioactive glass for immunomodulation and odontogenesis in pulpitis

Open access
Li, Jingyi, Wu, Jilin, Zhu, Lin, Mao, Sicong, Wang, Sainan, Jia, Peipei, Dong, Yanmei·2024·Materials Today Bio

Abstract

Preserving vital pulp in cases of dental pulpitis is desired but remains challenging. Previous research has shown that bioactive glass (BG) possesses notable capabilities for odontogenic differentiation. However, the immunoregulatory potential of BG for inflamed pulp is still controversial, which is essential for preserving vital pulp in the context of pulpitis. This study introduces a novel approach utilizing polydopamine-coated BG (BG-PDA) which demonstrates the ability to alleviate inflammation and promote odontogenesis for vital pulp therapy. In vitro, BG-PDA has the potential to induce M2 polarization of macrophages, resulting in decreased intracellular reactive oxygen species levels, inhibition of pro-inflammatory factor, and enhancement of anti-inflammatory factor expression. Furthermore, BG-PDA can strengthen the mitochondrial function in macrophages and facilitate odontogenic differentiation of human dental pulp cells. In a rat model of pulpitis, BG-PDA exhibits the capacity to promote M2 polarization of macrophages, alleviate inflammation, and facilitate dentin bridge formation. This study highlights the notable immunomodulatory and odontogenesis-inducing properties of BG-PDA for treating dental pulpitis, as evidenced by both in vitro and in vivo experiments. These results imply that BG-PDA could serve as a promising biomaterial for vital pulp therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101130

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PDA's multimodal adhesion mechanism enables it to firmly attach to nearly all classes of material surfaces, irrespective of their chemical composition or surface wettability, including hydrophilic and hydrophobic as well as organic and inorganic substrates.

    “This multimodal adhesion mechanism enables PDA to firmly attach to nearly all classes of material surfaces, irrespective of their chemical composition or surface wettability, including both hydrophilic and hydrophobic as well as organic and inorganic substrates.”

    From Polydopamine-Based Biomaterials in Oral Medicine: Applications, Mechanisms, and Translational Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Results (Characterization of BG-PDA; page unavailable) confirm that PDA coated bioactive glass, and the Discussion links PDA coating to mussel-inspired adhesion. The paper does not establish a multimodal adhesion mechanism or attachment across nearly all materials regardless of composition or wettability, including both hydrophilic and hydrophobic substrates. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Both PDA and its in vivo degradation products display negligible cytotoxicity and immunogenicity.

    “Extensive in vitro cellular assays and in vivo animal studies have confirmed that both PDA and its in vivo degradation products display negligible cytotoxicity and immunogenicity.”

    From Polydopamine-Based Biomaterials in Oral Medicine: Applications, Mechanisms, and Translational Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Results section (“Odontogenesis promotion and inflammation inhibition by BG-PDA”; page unavailable) reports that nearly all dental pulp cells remained alive when cultured with PDA-coated bioactive glass, supporting biocompatibility of that composite under the tested conditions. The Introduction says PDA degradation byproducts reduced inflammation in LPS-stimulated macrophages, but the paper does not establish negligible cytotoxicity or immunogenicity for PDA and its in vivo degradation products. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, J., Wu, J., Zhu, L., Mao, S., Wang, S., Jia, P., & Dong, Y.
Affiliations
Peking University (CN)
Corresponding author
Dong, Yanmei
Venue
Materials Today Bio
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-08
Volume
27
Pages
101130
ISSN
2590-0064 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399881173
Cited by
12
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Materials Today Bio (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81870753, 82370946)
  • Peking University Health Science Centre (BMU2024YFJHPY038)
  • Peking University
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Keywords
polydopamine coating, bioactive glass, pulpitis, vital pulp therapy, immunomodulation, tooth development, M2 macrophage polarization, macrophage inflammation, reactive oxygen species, mitochondrial function, dentin bridge formation, dental pulp cells, biomaterials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review