The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Smart wound dressings for wound healing
Abstract
Abstract Wound management is a big challenge worldwide, laying a huge financial burden on the government of every nation. Wound dressings that can facilitate wound healing have been under investigation for a long time. Conventional wound dressings, such as bandages, hydrogels and foams, help the wound healing not as efficiently as they were expected since they can’t respond to the wound healing process well. Smart wound dressings that can interact with the wounds, sense and react to the wound condition or environment changing by employing built-in sensors and/or smart materials such as stimuli-responsive materials and self-healing materials, have been proposed to effectively facilitate wound healing. During the past decade, smart wound dressings have sprouted, and various smart wound dressings including biomechanical wound dressing, stimuli-responsive wound dressing, self-healing wound dressing for motional wounds, self-removable wound dressing and monitoring wound dressing have emerged. However, a review on these smart wound dressings is lacking. Thus, in this review, a summary of smart wound dressings will be given, as well as the status, advances, challenges and future trends of this area, aiming to give researchers a clear understanding of the past, present and future of this emerging area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zhao, X., Liang, Y., Huang, Y., He, J., Han, Y., & Guo, B. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201910748 · Cited by 814
Self-citationShiekh, P. A., Singh, A., & Kumar, A. (2020) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120020 · Cited by 443
Chen, M., Tian, J., Liu, Y., Cao, H., Li, R., Wang, J., Wu, J., & Zhang, Q. (2019) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.043 · Cited by 281
Cited by
Shirzaei Sani, E., Xu, C., Wang, C., Song, Y., Min, J., Tu, J., Solomon, S. A., Li, J., Banks, J. L., Armstrong, D. G., et al. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adf7388 · Cited by 405
Antibacterial adhesive self-healing hydrogels to promote diabetic wound healing
Chen, J., He, J., Yang, Y., Qiao, L., Hu, J., Zhang, J., & Guo, B. (2022) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2022.04.041 · Cited by 359
Self-citationLiang, Y., Xu, H., Li, Z., Zhangji, A., & Guo, B. (2022) · Nano-Micro Letters · doi:10.1007/s40820-022-00928-z · Cited by 313
Self-citationGuo, H., Huang, S., Xu, A., & Xue, W. (2022) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c03944 · Cited by 204
Wang, W., Jia, B., Xu, H., Li, Z., Qiao, L., Zhao, Y., Huang, H., Zhao, X., & Guo, B. (2023) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2023.143362 · Cited by 85
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dong, R., & Guo, B.
- Venue
- Nano Today
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-12
- Volume
- 41
- Pages
- 101290
- ISSN
- 1748-0132 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3199686647
- Cited by
- 959
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 62.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Smart wound dressings for wound healing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101290
- The paper
- Dong, R., & Guo, B. (2021). Smart wound dressings for wound healing. Nano Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101290
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
