Cited by 648Technology and Human Factors in Education and HealthMedicine, History, and PhilosophyArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

A personal view on systems medicine and the emergence of proactive P4 medicine: predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory

Hood, Leroy, Flores, Mauricio·2012·New Biotechnology

Abstract

Systems biology and the digital revolution are together transforming healthcare to a proactive P4 medicine that is predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory. Systems biology - holistic, global and integrative in approach - has given rise to systems medicine, a systems approach to health and disease. Systems medicine promises to (1) provide deep insights into disease mechanisms, (2) make blood a diagnostic window for viewing health and disease for the individual, (3) stratify complex diseases into their distinct subtypes for a impedance match against proper drugs, (4) provide new approaches to drug target discovery and (5) generate metrics for assessing wellness. P4 medicine, the clinical face of systems medicine, has two major objectives: to quantify wellness and to demystify disease. Patients and consumers will be a major driver in the realization of P4 medicine through their participation in medically oriented social networks directed at improving their own healthcare. P4 medicine has striking implications for society - including the ability to turn around the ever-escalating costs of healthcare. The challenge in bringing P4 medicine to patients and consumers is twofold: first, inventing the strategies and technologies that will enable P4 medicine and second, dealing with the impact of P4 medicine on society - including key ethical, social, legal, regulatory, and economic issues. Managing the societal problems will pose the most significant challenges. Strategic partnerships of a variety of types will be necessary to bring P4 medicine to patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nbt.2012.03.004

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hood, L., & Flores, M.
Affiliations
Institute for Systems Biology (US)
Corresponding author
Hood, Leroy
Venue
New Biotechnology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
613-624
ISSN
1871-6784 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025945038
Cited by
648
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 9
FWCI
36.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 076547, P50GM076547)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
systems medicine, P4 medicine, systems biology, digital health, disease stratification, drug target identification, patient participation, health care costs, strategic partnership
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Preventive Medicine, Social Medicine, Systems Biology, Precision Medicine, Health Information Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review