Cited by 113Social Media in Health EducationEducational Technology in LearningImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Social media in nurse education: Utilization and E-professionalism

Duke, Valda J.A., Anstey, Allan, Carter, Sandra, Gosse, Natalie, Hutchens, Karen M., Marsh, Janice A.·2017·Nurse Education Today

Abstract

Objective To explore faculty and student utilization of social media and its professional implications in nurse education.Methods A descriptive study. Five hundred six Bachelor of Nursing students, 112 Practical Nursing students and 74 faculty members were invited to complete a questionnaire of 28 questions relating to social media.Results Three hundred thirty-seven students and 29 faculty responded. Students spent significantly more time using social media compared to faculty and both groups used it mainly for personal use. However, almost twice as many students used social media for educational purposes than did faculty (58.5% vs 27.6%, p<0.001). While almost 96% of students used social media to talk about academic related problems, only 28% of faculty did so (p<0.000). Almost 60% of faculty expressly disagreed with using social media to discuss academic related problems. YouTube and text messaging were popular platforms for educational purposes. While Facebook was also a popular educational site for students (95% used it for informal learning; 67% for formal learning), it was much less commonly used by faculty (45% used it for informal learning; 17% for formal learning). More students than faculty felt that they were aware of privacy features, and of the professional behavior expected when using social media. In addition, more students (90.7%) than faculty (71.43%) used these privacy features (p<0.000). However, 100% of students compared to only 13.79% of faculty reported that they had posted information that they would not want a prospective employer/member of academic staff to view (p=0.003).Conclusion There is a high reported usage of social media among students and faculty. Utilization of public platforms, while potentially beneficial, can have professional implications if not used appropriately with both personal and academic use. Developing best practice approaches for using social media in nurse education is essential to ensure that faculty and students are informed of e-professionalism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.009

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duke, V. J. A., Anstey, A., Carter, S., Gosse, N., Hutchens, K. M., & Marsh, J. A.
Affiliations
Centre for Nursing Studies (CA)
Corresponding author
Duke, Valda J.A.
Venue
Nurse Education Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
57
Pages
8-13
ISSN
0260-6917 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2723123689
Cited by
113
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9
FWCI
10.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nurse Education Today (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
social media, nursing education, e-professionalism, nursing students, nursing faculty, social media use, privacy awareness, professional conduct, Facebook, YouTube, text messaging, informal learning, best practice guidelines
MeSH terms
Professionalism, Adult, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Faculty, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Students, Nursing, Young Adult, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review