Cited by 32Social Media in Health EducationCyberloafing and Workplace BehaviorHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues

Professional conduct among Registered Nurses in the use of online social networking sites

Levati, Sara·2014·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

Aim: To explore the use of Facebook by Registered Nurses (RNs) in Italy and the United Kingdom (UK), focusing on the disclosure of personal and professional information. Background: The use of online social network sites among medical students and doctors is posing new ethical challenges to the profession. To date, little research has explored the use of online social networking sites among nurses. Design: A cross‐national survey. Methods: Data were assessed on 124 nurses’ profile pages, readily available without viewing restrictions. Content analysis and inferential statistics were undertaken to describe usage and identify similarities and differences between the two country‐groups of nurses. Data were collected between December 2011–January 2012. Results: Overall, UK and Italian RNs showed a similar use of the online platform, tending to disclose personal pictures, home town and current home location, as well as updates and comments related to personal and work‐related activities. A statistically significant higher proportion of nurses in Italy disclosed their sexual orientation. In both groups, a few cases were observed of potentially unprofessional content in relation to the use of alcohol, nudity and material of a salacious nature. Conclusion: Although most of the UK and Italy RNs appear to be aware of the risks posed by their online exposure, their online activity indicates the blurring of their personal and professional lives; this is posing new ethical, legal and professional challenges to members of the nursing profession. Further research and debate is encouraged at national and international level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jan.12377

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levati, S.
Affiliations
Glasgow Caledonian University (GB)
Corresponding author
Levati, Sara
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-03-12
Volume
70
Issue
10
Pages
2284-2292
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W2105363586
Cited by
32
References
24
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Keywords
registered nurses, online social networking, Facebook, professional conduct, personal information disclosure, professional ethics, coming out, personal and professional boundaries, cross-national comparison, Italy, United Kingdom
MeSH terms
United Kingdom, Humans, Nursing Staff, Professional Competence, Social Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review