Cited by 435Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 268 of the 268 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cellular and molecular neuropathology of the cuprizone mouse model: Clinical relevance for multiple sclerosis

Open access
Praet, Jelle, Guglielmetti, Caroline, Berneman, Zwi, Van der Linden, Annemie, Ponsaerts, Peter·2014·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

The cuprizone mouse model allows the investigation of the complex molecular mechanisms behind nonautoimmune-mediated demyelination and spontaneous remyelination. While it is generally accepted that oligodendrocytes are specifically vulnerable to cuprizone intoxication due to their high metabolic demands, a comprehensive overview of the etiology of cuprizone-induced pathology is still missing to date. In this review we extensively describe the physico-chemical mode of action of cuprizone and discuss the molecular and enzymatic mechanisms by which cuprizone induces metabolic stress, oligodendrocyte apoptosis, myelin degeneration and eventually axonal and neuronal pathology. In addition, we describe the dual effector function of the immune system which tightly controls demyelination by effective induction of oligodendrocyte apoptosis, but in contrast also paves the way for fast and efficient remyelination by the secretion of neurotrophic factors and the clearance of cellular and myelinic debris. Finally, we discuss the many clinical symptoms that can be observed following cuprizone treatment, and how these strengthened the cuprizone model as a useful tool to study human multiple sclerosis, schizophrenia and epilepsy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.10.004

Cites

268 of 268 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 268 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 435

Metadata

Authors
Praet, J., Guglielmetti, C., Berneman, Z., Van der Linden, A., & Ponsaerts, P.
Affiliations
University of Antwerp (BE)
Corresponding author
Praet, Jelle
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
47
Pages
485-505
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991883207
Cited by
435
References
268
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 12
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fund for Scientific Research-Flanders
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
cuprizone, multiple sclerosis, demyelination, remyelination, oligodendrocyte apoptosis, myelin degeneration, metabolic stress, neuroinflammation, neurotrophic factors, myelin debris clearance, axonal pathology, neuronal pathology, schizophrenia, epilepsy, mouse model
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Cuprizone, Disease Models, Animal, Multiple Sclerosis, Myelin Sheath, Neuroglia, Neurons, Oxidative Stress, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review