Cited by 166AI in cancer detectionRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

Stacked deep polynomial network based representation learning for tumor classification with small ultrasound image dataset

Shi, Jun, Zhou, Shichong, Liu, Xiao, Zhang, Qi, Lu, Minhua, Wang, Tianfu·2016·Neurocomputing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.01.074

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Liu et al. and Shi et al. employed deep polynomial network or stacked DPN on two small US datasets and obtained highest classification accuracies of 92.4%, outperforming unsupervised deep learning algorithms such as stacked AE and DBN.

    “Both Liu et al. [87] and Shi et al. [19] employed a supervised deep learning algorithm called a deep polynomial network (DPN), or its stacked version, namely stacked DPN (S-DPN), on two small US datasets.”

    From Deep Learning in Medical Ultrasound Analysis: A Review (2019) · cites this paper as [19]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shi, J., Zhou, S., Liu, X., Zhang, Q., Lu, M., & Wang, T.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai University (CN)
  • Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN)
  • Shenzhen University (CN)
Corresponding author
Lu, Minhua
Venue
Neurocomputing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
194
Pages
87-94
ISSN
0925-2312 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2288062769
Cited by
166
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 6
FWCI
19.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Neurocomputing (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61471231, 61471243, 61401267)
  • Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (13YZ016)
  • Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging
  • Shenzhen Project (SGLH20131010163759789, JCYJ20150731160834611)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
feature representation learning, tumor classification, ultrasonography, small sample size problem, computer-aided diagnosis, stacked autoencoder, deep belief network

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review