Cited by 109Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics

A Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Framework for Automatic Fetal Facial Standard Plane Recognition

Yu, Zhen, Tan, Ee-Leng, Ni, Dong, Qin, Jing, Chen, Siping, Li, Shengli, Lei, Baiying, Wang, Tianfu·2018·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Abstract

Ultrasound imaging has become a prevalent examination method in prenatal diagnosis. Accurate acquisition of fetal facial standard plane (FFSP) is the most important precondition for subsequent diagnosis and measurement. In the past few years, considerable effort has been devoted to FFSP recognition using various hand-crafted features, but the recognition performance is still unsatisfactory due to the high intraclass variation of FFSPs and the high degree of visual similarity between FFSPs and other non-FFSPs. To improve the recognition performance, we propose a method to automatically recognize FFSP via a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) architecture. The proposed DCNN consists of 16 convolutional layers with small 3 × 3 size kernels and three fully connected layers. A global average pooling is adopted in the last pooling layer to significantly reduce network parameters, which alleviates the overfitting problems and improves the performance under limited training data. Both the transfer learning strategy and a data augmentation technique tailored for FFSP are implemented to further boost the recognition performance. Extensive experiments demonstrate the advantage of our proposed method over traditional approaches and the effectiveness of DCNN to recognize FFSP for clinical diagnosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2017.2705031

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, Z., Tan, E.-L., Ni, D., Qin, J., Chen, S., Li, S., Lei, B., & Wang, T.
Affiliations
  • Shenzhen University (CN)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital (CN)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2018-05
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
874-885
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W2614217642
Cited by
109
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81571758, 61571304, 61402296, 61427806)
  • National Key Research and Develop Program (2016YFC0104703)
  • Guangdong Medical (B2016094)
  • Shenzhen Peacock Plan (KQTD2016053112051497)
  • Shenzhen Key Basic Research (JCYJ20150525092940986, JCYJ20150525092940988)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of Shenzhen University (827000197)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Keywords
prenatal ultrasound, deep convolutional neural networks, transfer learning, data augmentation, prenatal diagnosis, intra-class variation, global average pooling
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Face, Female, Fetus, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Pregnancy, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review