Cited by 104Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques

Use of NAD(P)H and flavoprotein autofluorescence transients to probe neuron and astrocyte responses to synaptic activation

Open access
Shuttleworth, C. William·2010·Neurochemistry International

Abstract

Synaptic stimulation in brain slices is accompanied by changes in tissue autofluorescence, which are a consequence of changes in tissue metabolism. Autofluorescence excited by ultraviolet light has been most extensively studied, and is due to reduced pyridine nucleotides (NADH and NADPH, collectively termed NAD(P)H). Stimulation generates a characteristic compound NAD(P)H response, comprising an initial fluorescence decrease and then an overshooting increase that slowly recovers to baseline levels. Evoked NAD(P)H transients are relatively easy to record, do not require the addition of exogenous indicators and have good signal-noise ratios. These characteristics make NAD(P)H imaging methods very useful for tracking the spread of neuronal activity in complex brain tissues, however the cellular basis of synaptically-evoked autofluorescence transients has been the subject of recent debate. Of particular importance is the question of whether signals are due primarily to changes in neuronal mitochondrial function, and/or whether astrocyte metabolism triggered by glutamate uptake may be a significant contributor to the overshooting NAD(P)H fluorescence increases. This mini-review addresses the subcellular origins of NAD(P)H autofluorescence and the evidence for mitochondrial and glycolytic contributions to compound transients. It is concluded that there is no direct evidence for a contribution to NAD(P)H signals from glycolysis in astrocytes following synaptic glutamate uptake. In contrast, multiple lines of evidence, including from complimentary flavoprotein autofluorescence signals, imply that mitochondrial NADH dynamics in neurons dominate compound evoked NAD(P)H transients. These signals are thus appropriate for studies of mitochondrial function and dysfunction in brain slices, in addition to providing robust maps of postsynaptic neuronal activation following physiological activation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuint.2009.12.015

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • NAD(P)H autofluorescence is almost certainly dominated by mitochondrial NADH.

    “The NAD(P)H autofluorescence is almost certainly dominated by mitochondrial NADH (Brennan et al., 2006; Shuttleworth, 2010; Berndt et al., 2015).”

    From Neuronal Stimulation Triggers Neuronal Glycolysis and Not Lactate Uptake (2017) · cites this paper as Shuttleworth, 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Fonnum F Johnsen A Hassel B 1997 Use of fluorocitrate and fluoroacetate in the study of brain metabolism Glia 21 106 113 9298853
  2. Nicholls DG Ferguson SJ 2002 Bioenergetics Elsevier Science

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shuttleworth, C. W.
Affiliations
University of New Mexico (US)
Corresponding author
Shuttleworth, C. William
Venue
Neurochemistry International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
56
Issue
3
Pages
379-386
ISSN
0197-0186 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149009994
Cited by
104
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurochemistry International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P20GM109089)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS051288, R01NS051288)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Keywords
NAD(P)H autofluorescence, synaptic activation, astrocyte metabolism, mitochondrial function, glycolysis, glutamate uptake, neuronal activity imaging, brain slices
MeSH terms
Animals, Astrocytes, Brain, Flavoproteins, Fluorescent Dyes, Humans, Mitochondria, NADP, Synaptic Transmission, Neurochemistry, Neurons, Metabolic Networks and Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review