CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 37

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatial navigation in the Morris water maze: working and long lasting reference memories

Baldi, Elisabetta, Efoudebe, Marcel, Lorenzini, Carlo Ambrogi, Bucherelli, Corrado·2005·Neuroscience Letters
DOI 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.12.029
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Spatial navigation development in the Morris water maze (MWM) paradigm was studied in 70-day-old male Long-Evans hooded rats. During 5 consecutive days, rats' training consisted of a daily block of 10 trials. Escape latency was measured in each trial. Probe testing was performed every day immediately before and after the daily block of trials. In addition, a final probe was performed on Day 6. During the first 3 days of training, the escape latency became progressively shorter, showing an asymptotic trend on Days 4 and 5. Probe trials administered at the end of the first acquisition sessions showed clear preference for the target quadrant but this information was not recalled at probe trials given 24h later. The memory trace retrieved after 24-h delay was formed only after 30 trials received over three sessions. The probe trial given at the end of an acquisition session tests the efficiency of the working memory whereas the 24h delayed probe trial reflects better-consolidated spatial information corresponding to long lasting reference memory. It can be noted that the progressive shortening of escape latencies does not express closely the evolution of the rat's long lasting (consolidated) reference memory. This memory can be satisfactorily measured only by probe testing performed at an adequate delay after training. These considerations may be of some interest when interpreting the rat's performance in the MWM.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.12.029

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A 24 h interval between the last training trial and the probe trial allows reference memory to be tested, independent of the short-term memory of the last training session.

    “A 24 h interval between the last training trial and the probe trial allows reference memory to be tested, independent of the short-term memory of the last training session [94].”

    From Inhibition of ACAT as a Therapeutic Target for Alzheimer's Disease Is Independent of ApoE4 Lipidation (2023) · cites this paper as [94]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Baldi, 2003, Task solving by procedural strategies in the Morris water maze, Physiol. Behav., 78, 785, 10.1016/S0031-9384(03)00064-7 · DOI
  2. Bannerman, 1995, Distinct components of spatial learning revealed by prior training and NMDA receptor blockade, Nature, 378, 182, 10.1038/378182a0 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bannerman, 2001, The role of the entorhinal cortex in two forms of spatial learning and memory, Exp. Brain Res., 141, 281, 10.1007/s002210100868 · DOI
  4. Brown, 2000, d-Amphetamine facilitation of Morris water task performance is blocked by eticlopride and correlated with increased dopamine synthesis in the prefrontal cortex, Behav. Brain Res., 114, 135, 10.1016/S0166-4328(00)00225-4 · DOI
  5. Buresova, 1988, Does nondirectional signalization of target distance contribute to navigation in the Morris water maze?, Behav. Neural Biol., 4, 240
  6. Carman, 2003, Proximal versus distal cue utilization in preweanling spatial localization: the influence of cue number and location, Physiol. Behav., 79, 157, 10.1016/S0031-9384(03)00089-1 · DOI
  7. Carman, 2001, Ontogeny of spatial navigation in rats: a role for response requirements?, Behav. Neurosci., 115, 870, 10.1037/0735-7044.115.4.870 · DOI
  8. Dalm, 2000, Quantification of swim patterns in the Morris water maze, Behav. Res. Methods Instr. Comp., 32, 134, 10.3758/BF03200795 · DOI
  9. D’Hooge, 2001, Applications of the Morris water maze in the study of learning and memory, Brain Res. Rev., 36, 60, 10.1016/S0165-0173(01)00067-4 · DOI
  10. DiMattia, 1988, Spatial cognitive maps: differential role of parietal cortex and hippocampal formation, Behav. Neurosci., 102, 471, 10.1037/0735-7044.102.4.471 · DOI
  11. Fenton, 1993, Place navigation in rats with unilateral tetrodotoxin inactivation of the dorsal hippocampus: place but not procedural learning can be lateralized to one hippocampus, Behav. Neurosci., 107, 552, 10.1037/0735-7044.107.4.552 · DOI
  12. Maaswinkel, 1999, Homing with locale, taxon, and dead reckoning strategies by foraging rats: sensory hierarchy in spatial navigation, Behav. Brain Res., 99, 143, 10.1016/S0166-4328(98)00100-4 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Markowska, 1993, Variable-interval probe test as a tool for repeated measurements of spatial memory in the water maze, Behav. Neurosci., 107, 627, 10.1037/0735-7044.107.4.627 · DOI
  14. Means, 1992, Those cheating rats: male and female rats use odor trails in a water-escape “working memory” task, Behav. Neural Biol., 58, 144, 10.1016/0163-1047(92)90387-J · DOI
  15. Moghaddam, 1996, Contribution of egocentric spatial memory to place navigation of rats in the Morris water maze, Behav. Brain Res., 78, 121, 10.1016/0166-4328(95)00240-5 · DOI
  16. Morris, 1981, Spatial localization does not require the presence of local cues, Learn. Motiv., 12, 239, 10.1016/0023-9690(81)90020-5 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Morris, 1984, Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat, J. Neurosci. Methods, 11, 47, 10.1016/0165-0270(84)90007-4 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Petrosini, 1998, The cerebellum in the spatial problem solving: a co-star or a guest star?, Prog. Neurobiol., 56, 191, 10.1016/S0301-0082(98)00036-7 · DOI
  19. Sarihi, 2000, Lidocaine reversible inactivation of the median raphe nucleus has no effect on reference memory but enhances working memory versions of the Morris water maze task, Behav. Brain Res., 114, 1, 10.1016/S0166-4328(00)00176-5 · DOI
  20. Schenk, 1985, Dissociation between components of spatial memory in rats after recovery from the effects of retrohippocampal lesions, Exp. Brain Res., 58, 11, 10.1007/BF00238949 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Spreng, 2002, Spaced training facilitates long-term retention of place navigation in adult but not in adolescent rats, Behav. Brain Res., 128, 103, 10.1016/S0166-4328(01)00266-2 · DOI
  22. Sutherland, 1984, Place navigation by rats in a swimming pool, Can. J. Psychol., 38, 322, 10.1037/h0080832 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Baldi, E., Efoudebe, M., Lorenzini, C. A., & Bucherelli, C.
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-04
Volume
378
Issue
3
Pages
176-180
ISSN
0304-3940
DOI
10.1016/j.neulet.2004.12.029
Cited by
37
References
2
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review