The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect.
Abstract
We report an experiment designed to investigate the temporal dynamics of the visuotactile crossmodal congruency effect. Vibrotactile targets were presented randomly to the index finger (top side of a hand-held cube) or thumb (bottom side) of either hand while visual distractors were presented randomly from one of the same four possible locations. The stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between the vibrotactile target and the visual distractor was varied on a trial-by-trial basis. Participants made speeded discrimination responses regarding the elevation of the vibrotactile targets (i.e., upper versus lower) while trying to ignore the visual distractors. The largest crossmodal congruency effects (defined as the difference in performance between incongruent and congruent elevation distractor trials) were obtained when the visual distractor preceded the vibrotactile target by 50-100 ms, although significant effects were also reported when the distractor followed the target by as much as 100 ms. These results are discussed in terms of the conjoint influence of response competition, crossmodal perceptual interactions (i.e., the ventriloquism effect), and exogenous spatial attention on the crossmodal congruency effect. The distinct temporal signatures of each of these effects are also highlighted.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) of 33 msec in study 1 was chosen based on previous studies on CCEs [30], [33] which reported maximal CCEs for an SOA of ∼30–100 msec.”
From Keeping in touch with one’s self: multisensory mechanisms of self-consciousness (2009) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“we chose an SOA of 233 msec based on results showing that the CCE is still present for SOAs of ∼200 msec [33].”
From Keeping in touch with one’s self: multisensory mechanisms of self-consciousness (2009) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“It is well known that multisensory integration is strongly influenced by the temporal relations between stimuli [33], [35]–[37].”
From Keeping in touch with one’s self: multisensory mechanisms of self-consciousness (2009) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“Response bias – where, e.g. incongruent ‘up’ stimuli prime the ‘up response’ - is another factor thought to contribute to CCE magnitude [30], [33], [44] - but it cannot explain the differential side effects found in all three studies.”
From Keeping in touch with one’s self: multisensory mechanisms of self-consciousness (2009) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cites
Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs
Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03210951 · Cited by 2,433
Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses.
Gratton, G., COLES, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.121.4.480 · Cited by 1,866
The stroop color-word test: A review
Jensen, A. R., & Rohwer, W. D. (1966) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(66)90004-7 · Cited by 958
The Handbook of Multisensory Processes
(2004) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3422.001.0001 · Cited by 948
A Solution to the Effect of Sample Size on Outlier Elimination
Selst, M. V., & Jolicœur, P. (1994) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/14640749408401131 · Cited by 844
Crossmodal Space and Crossmodal Attention
(2004) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524861.001.0001 · Cited by 801
Logan, G. D., & Zbrodoff, N. J. (1979) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197535 · Cited by 599
Multisensory integration and the body schema: Close to hand and within reach
Maravita, A., Spence, C., & Driver, J. (2003) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00449-4 · Cited by 578
Self-citationSpence, C. J., Shore, D. I., & Klein, R. M. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.799 · Cited by 477
Self-citationTemporal and spatial dependency of the ventriloquism effect
Slutsky, D. A., & Recanzone, G. H. (2001) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-200101220-00009 · Cited by 344
Hommel, B. (1993) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/bf00419688 · Cited by 302
Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-modal distractor congruency effects
Spence, C. J., Pavani, F., & Driver, J. (2004) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.4.2.148 · Cited by 286
Self-citationCrossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention.
Spence, C., Pavani, F., & Driver, J. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.26.4.1298 · Cited by 282
Self-citationSpence, C., Pavani, F., Maravita, A., & Holmes, N. (2004) · Journal of Physiology-Paris · doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2004.03.008 · Cited by 205
Self-citationHolmes, N. P., Calvert, G. A., & Spence, C. (2004) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2004.09.024 · Cited by 197
Self-citationCross-Modal Interactions in Speeded Classification
Marks, L. E. (2004) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3422.003.0009 · Cited by 151
Kennett, S., Spence, C. J., & Driver, J. (2002) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03194758 · Cited by 124
Self-citationExogenous Spatial-Cuing Studies of Human Cross-Modal Attention and Multisensory Integration
Spence, C. J., McDonald, J. J., & Driver, J. (2004) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524861.003.0011 · Cited by 120
Self-citationThe duration of word meaning responses: Stroop interference for different preexposures of the word
Dyer, F. N. (1971) · Psychonomic Science · doi:10.3758/bf03329102 · Cited by 94
Representation of Visuotactile Space in the Split Brain
Spence, C. J., Kingstone, A. F., Shore, D. I., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (2001) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00316 · Cited by 87
Self-citationIntegration of visual and tactile stimuli: top-down influences require time
Shore, D. I., & Simić, N. (2005) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-005-2391-x · Cited by 25
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Spence, 1998, What crossing the hands can reveal about crossmodal links in spatial attention, Abstr. Psychonom. Soc., 3, 13
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review
Spence, C. (2011) · Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-010-0073-7 · Cited by 1,618
Self-citationMultisensory brain mechanisms of bodily self-consciousness.
Blanke, O. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3292 · Cited by 1,147
Aspell, J. E., Heydrich, L., Marillier, G., Lavanchy, T., Herbelin, B., & Blanke, O. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797613498395 · Cited by 257
Keeping in touch with one’s self: multisensory mechanisms of self-consciousness
Aspell, J. E., Lenggenhager, B., & Blanke, O. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006488 · Cited by 205
Ludwig, V. U., Adachi, I., & Matsuzawa, T. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1112605108 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Shore, D. I., Barnes, M. E., & Spence, C.
- Affiliations
- McMaster University (CA)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Shore, David I.
- Venue
- Neuroscience Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 392
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 96-100
- ISSN
- 0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056416584
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 5.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- crossmodal congruency, temporal dynamics, stimulus onset asynchrony, visual distractors, response competition, ventriloquism effect, multisensory integration
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attention, Discrimination, Psychological, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Photic Stimulation, Proprioception, Reaction Time, Space Perception, Touch, Vibration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
