Cited by 24Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsCellular Mechanics and InteractionsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

An artificial three-dimensional matrix promotes ramification in the microglial cell-line, BV-2

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture yields strikingly different cell phenotypes compared to two-dimensional (2D) cell culture. Since microglia, monocyte derived immune cells in the brain, exist in a variety of cell shapes ranging from amoeboid to ramified, we evaluated the impact of 2D versus 3D culture conditions on cell shape. The microglial cell-line, BV-2, was either cultured on poly-D-lysine coated dishes (2D culture conditions) or in a BD Pura Matrix Peptide Hydrogel (3D culture conditions) in the absence or presence of the extracellular matrix proteins, fibronectin and collagen type I, respectively. We identified five distinct morphological phenotypes (amoeboid, bipolar, tripolar, multipolar, ramified) and compared the frequency distribution of these phenotypes under different culture conditions using a chi(2) test. Culture of BV-2 cells in an inert 3D matrix shifted the frequency distribution from an amoeboid dominated population, which is typical for BV-2 cells cultured under conventional 2D conditions, to a population dominated by multipolar phenotypes. Fibronectin or collagen type I significantly suppressed matrix-induced ramification. These cell culture experiments illustrate the dependency of cell shape on spatial distribution of potential adhesion sites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.09.082

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 3D Matrix hydrogels support microglia to grow and maintain ramified morphology and enable microglial response tests to proinflammation stimulus.

    “For example, 3D Matrix hydrogels were reported to support microglia to grow and maintain ramified morphology and enable the microglial response tests to proinflammation stimulus.24, 25”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Del-Rio Hortega, 1932, Microglia, vol. 2, 481

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pöttler, M., Zierler, S., & Kerschbaum, H. H.
Affiliations
University of Salzburg (AT)
Corresponding author
Kerschbaum, Hubert H.
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-12
Volume
410
Issue
2
Pages
137-140
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977167767
Cited by
24
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
microglia, 3D cell culture, cell morphology, ramified microglia, cell shape, extracellular matrix, fibronectin, type I collagen, poly-D-lysine, cell adhesion
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Count, Cell Line, Extracellular Matrix, Fibronectins, Chi-Square Distribution, Microglia, Cell Culture Techniques, Collagen Type I, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review