Cited by 28Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGastrointestinal motility and disordersRegulation of Appetite and Obesity

Effects of intraduodenal injection of Lactobacillus brevis SBC8803 on autonomic neurotransmission and appetite in rodents

Horii, Yuko, Nakakita, Yasukazu, Fujisaki, Yoshiyuki, Yamamoto, Saori, Itoh, Nanako, Miyazaki, Koyomi, Kaneda, Hirotaka, Oishi, Katsutaka +2 more·2013·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

Lactobacilli provide several health benefits to mammals, including humans. We previously observed that in rats, intraduodenal injection of Lactobacillus johnsonii La1 elevated efferent gastric vagal nerve activity (efferent-GVNA), while Lactobacillus paracasei ST11 suppressed efferent-GVNA, and thereby increased or decreased food intake. To determine the function of Lactobacillus brevis (SBC8803), its effect on food intake was examined by providing food containing heat-killed SBC8803 to mice. We observed that administration of SBC8803 elevated food intake. Because the afferent intestinal vagal nerve (IVN) is hypothesized to be involved in efferent-GVNA changes, we examined the effect of intraduodenal administration of heat-killed SBC8803 on efferent-GVNA and afferent-IVN activity (IVNA) in rats. In this study, we found that intraduodenal administration of heat-killed SBC8803 increased both efferent-GVNA and afferent-IVNA in rats. Moreover, IV administration of the serotonin 3 receptor antagonist granisetron eliminated the effects of SBC8803 on efferent-GVNA and afferent-IVNA. These findings suggest that heat-killed SBC8803 enhances appetite by elevating digestion and absorption abilities via changes in autonomic neurotransmission that might be mediated by the serotonin 3 receptor.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.01.037

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 11 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horii, Y., Nakakita, Y., Fujisaki, Y., Yamamoto, S., Itoh, N., Miyazaki, K., Kaneda, H., Oishi, K., Shigyo, T., & Nagai, K.
Affiliations
  • ANBAS Corp. (Japan) (JP)
  • National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (JP)
  • Sapporo Holdings (Japan) (JP)
Corresponding author
Horii, Yuko
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
539
Pages
32-37
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146135984
Cited by
28
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (23617040)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Keywords
probiotics, intraduodenal administration, autonomic neurotransmission, appetite, dietary intake, granisetron, heat-killed bacteria, digestion and absorption
MeSH terms
Afferent Pathways, Animals, Appetite, Duodenum, Eating, Efferent Pathways, Intestines, Male, Mice, Inbred C3H, Synaptic Transmission, Serotonin Antagonists, Stomach, Vagus Nerve, Rats, Wistar, Granisetron, Mice, Rats, Levilactobacillus brevis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review