Cited by 387Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDiabetes Treatment and Management

Efficacy of PPAR-γ agonist pioglitazone in mild Alzheimer disease

Sato, Tomohiko, Hanyu, Haruo, Hirao, Kentaro, Kanetaka, Hidekazu, Sakurai, Hirofumi, Iwamoto, Toshihiko·2011·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

To test the effects of the PPAR-γ agonist pioglitazone on cognition, regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF), and plasma levels of Aβ40 and Aβ42, we conducted a 6-month, randomized, open-controlled trial in patients with mild Alzheimer disease (AD) accompanied with type II diabetes mellitus. We randomly assigned 42 patients to either the group treated with 15-30 mg pioglitazone daily (n=21, pioglitazone group) or not (n=21, control group). The pioglitazone group improved cognition and rCBF in the parietal lobe, while the control group showed no such improvement. The plasma Aβ40/Aβ42 ratio increased in the control group, but showed no significant change in the pioglitazone group. Both groups showed good control of diabetes during the study. In addition, pioglitazone treatment resulted in a decrease in fasting plasma insulin levels, indicating enhanced insulin sensitivity. The results of this pilot study demonstrated that pioglitazone exhibited cognitive and functional improvements, and stabilization of the disease in diabetic patients with AD. Pioglitazone may offer a novel strategy for the treatment of AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.10.009

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sato, T., Hanyu, H., Hirao, K., Kanetaka, H., Sakurai, H., & Iwamoto, T.
Affiliations
Tokyo Medical University (JP)
Corresponding author
Sato, Tomohiko
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
32
Issue
9
Pages
1626-1633
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976619844
Cited by
387
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 30
FWCI
12.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
pioglitazone, PPARγ agonists, mild Alzheimer disease, type 2 diabetes, regional cerebral blood flow, plasma amyloid-beta, cognitive function, insulin sensitivity, fasting insulin, parietal lobe
MeSH terms
Pioglitazone, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition Disorders, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Pilot Projects, Thiazolidinediones, PPAR gamma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review