Cited by 35Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging and Gerontology ResearchCognitive Functions and Memory

What are the later life contributions to reserve, resilience, and compensation?

Open access
Burke, Sara N., Mormino, Elizabeth C., Rogalski, Emily J., Kawas, Claudia H., Willis, Robert J., Park, Denise C.·2019·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

Many studies have shown that early-life experiences can contribute to later life cognitive reserve and resilience. However, there is evidence to suggest that later life experiences and lifestyle choices can also play a vital role in the brain's ability to respond to and compensate for neural insults associated with aging. Engaging in a diversity of behaviorally, socially, and cognitively rich activities may forge new neural pathways that can perhaps provide greater flexibility in confronting the challenges associated with accumulating brain pathology. Studies of cognitively normal individuals with pathology and of individuals who have aged exceptionally well may provide insights that are generalizable to the overall elderly population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.03.023

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burke, S. N., Mormino, E. C., Rogalski, E. J., Kawas, C. H., Willis, R. J., & Park, D. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
Corresponding author
Park, Denise C.
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
83
Pages
140-144
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2971493727
Cited by
35
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Research Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
cognitive reserve, resilience, compensation, lifestyle choices, brain aging, neuroplasticity, cognitive aging, neuropathology, exceptional longevity, cognitively normal older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Cognition, Humans, Life Style, Cognitive Reserve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review