Cited by 71Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCerebrovascular and genetic disorders

Cerebral amyloid burden is associated with white matter hyperintensity location in specific posterior white matter regions

Open access
Weaver, Nick A., Doeven, Thomas, Barkhof, Frederik, Biesbroek, J. Matthijs, Groeneveld, Onno N., Kuijf, Hugo J., Prins, Niels D., Scheltens, Philip +3 more·2019·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are a common manifestation of cerebral small vessel disease. WMHs are also frequently observed in patients with familial and sporadic Alzheimer's disease, often with a particular posterior predominance. Whether amyloid and tau pathologies are linked to WMH occurrence is still debated. We examined whether cerebral amyloid and tau burden, reflected in cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-beta 1-42 (Aβ-42) and phosphorylated tau (p-tau), are related to WMH location in a cohort of 517 memory clinic patients. Two lesion mapping techniques were performed: voxel-based analyses and region of interest-based linear regression. Voxelwise associations were found between lower Aβ-42 and parieto-occipital periventricular WMHs. Regression analyses demonstrated that lower Aβ-42 correlated with larger WMH volumes in the splenium of the corpus callosum and posterior thalamic radiation, also after controlling for markers of vascular disease. P-tau was not consistently related to WMH occurrence. Our findings indicate that cerebral amyloid burden is associated with WMHs located in specific posterior white matter regions, possibly reflecting region-specific effects of amyloid pathology on the white matter.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.08.001

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The majority of published studies have emphasized the spatial heterogeneity of WMHs but have left the potential heterogeneous influences of regional Aβ deposition relatively unexplored.

    “The majority of published studies have emphasized the spatial heterogeneity of WMHs [25,26], but have left the potential heterogeneous influences of regional Aβ deposition relatively unexplored.”

    From Amyloid-PET and White Matter Hyperintensities Have Independent Effects on Baseline Cognitive Function and Synergistic Effects on Longitudinal Executive Function (2023) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Introduction describes prior studies of differing WMH locations across conditions, supporting the citation’s point that spatial heterogeneity has received attention. It does not establish that a majority of published studies emphasized this topic. Its discussion of limited amyloid-related research concerns overall amyloid burden and WMH location, not specifically the heterogeneous influences of regional Aβ deposition. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weaver, N. A., Doeven, T., Barkhof, F., Biesbroek, J. M., Groeneveld, O. N., Kuijf, H. J., Prins, N. D., Scheltens, P., Teunissen, C. E., van der Flier, W. M., & Biessels, G. J.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL)
Corresponding author
Weaver, Nick A.
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
84
Pages
225-234
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2967452790
Cited by
71
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Hartstichting
  • ZonMw
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders
Keywords
white matter hyperintensities, amyloid-beta 42, phosphorylated tau, splenium of corpus callosum, posterior thalamic radiation, periventricular lesions, cerebral small vessel disease, Alzheimer's disease, lesion mapping, memory clinic patients
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Peptide Fragments, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, White Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review