Cited by 148Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Ecphory of autobiographical memories: an fMRI study of recent and remote memory retrieval.

Open access
Steinvorth, Sarah, Corkin, Suzanne, Halgren, Eric·2006·NeuroImage

Abstract

Ecphory occurs when one recollects a past event cued by a trigger, such as a picture, odor, or name. It is a central component of autobiographical memory, which allows us to "travel mentally back in time" and re-experience specific events from our personal past. Using fMRI and focusing on the role of medial temporal lobe (MTL) structures, we investigated the brain bases of autobiographical memory and whether they change with the age of memories. Importantly, we used an ecphory task in which the remote character of the memories was ensured. The results showed that a large bilateral network supports autobiographical memory: temporal lobe, temporo-parieto-occipital junction, dorsal prefrontal cortex, medial frontal cortex, retrosplenial cortex and surrounding areas, and MTL structures. This network, including MTL structures, changed little with the age of the memories.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.025

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The dorsal attentional network and the default-mode network work in tandem to facilitate further activation of the central executive network necessary to carry out higher-order cognitive tasks, including emotional regulatory processes, which are typically altered among individuals with PTSD.

    “The dorsal attentional network and the default-mode network are thought to work in tandem to facilitate further activation of the central executive network necessary to carry out higher-order cognitive tasks, including emotional regulatory processes (Picó-Pérez et al., 2017; Zilverstand et al., 2017) typically altered among individuals with PTSD (Steinvorth et al., 2006; Andrews-Hanna et al., 2014”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steinvorth, S., Corkin, S., & Halgren, E.
Affiliations
Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Steinvorth, Sarah
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-03
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
285-298
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031599878
Cited by
148
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Center for Research Resources (P41RR14075)
  • Mind and Life Institute
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
autobiographical memory, memory retrieval, remote memory, recent memory, medial temporal lobe, artificial neural networks, retrosplenial cortex, dorsal prefrontal cortex, memory age
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Association Learning, Autobiographies as Topic, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Cues, Dominance, Cerebral, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neural Pathways, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Mental Recall, Retention, Psychology, Semantics, Parahippocampal Gyrus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review