Cited by 249Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and Memory

Hippocampal amnesia

Spiers, Hugo J., Maguire, Eleanor A., Burgess, Neil·2001·Neurocase

Abstract

This article reviews 147 cases of amnesia following damage including the hippocampus or fornix as reported in 179 publications. The aetiology, mnestic abilities and reference(s) are tabulated for each case. Consistent findings across cases include the association of bilateral hippocampal damage with a deficit in anterograde episodic memory combined with spared procedural and working memory. The limited nature of retrograde amnesia following lesions to the fornix is also noted. Less consistent and thus more controversial findings, include effects of lesion size or laterality, deficits in semantic memory or familiarity-based recognition and the extent of retrograde amnesia. The evidence concerning these issues is reviewed across cases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1076/neur.7.5.357.16245

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both retrosplenial damage and hippocampal damage can cause anterograde amnesia.

    “This outcome is to be expected as both retrosplenial damage and hippocampal damage can cause anterograde amnesia (Spiers et al., 2001; Valenstein et al., 1987; Vann et al., 2009)”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Spiers et al., 2001

  • Prior neuropsychological research has consistently indicated the dominance of the right hemisphere in processing spatial information.

    “Prior neuropsychological research has consistently indicated the dominance of the right hemisphere in processing spatial information (Spiers et al. 2001; Burgess et al. 2001, 2002)”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spiers, H. J., Maguire, E. A., & Burgess, N.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Venue
Neurocase
Published
2001-01
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
357-382
ISSN
  • 1355-4794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3656
OpenAlex
W4250877397
Cited by
249
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 15
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurocase (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Research Councils UK
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
hippocampal amnesia, fornix lesions, anterograde amnesia, retrograde amnesia, episodic memory, procedural memory, working memory, semantic memory, familiarity-based recognition, lesion size, hemispheric lateralization, case series
MeSH terms
Amnesia, Amnesia, Retrograde, Brain Mapping, Hippocampus, Humans, Mental Recall, Entorhinal Cortex, Fornix, Brain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review