Cited by 911Tactile and Sensory InteractionsMultisensory perception and integrationTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Functional relevance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humans

Cohen, Leonardo G., Celnik, Pablo, Pascual-Leone, Alvaro, Corwell, Brian, Faiz, Lala, Dambrosia, James, Honda, Manabu, Sadato, Norihiro +3 more·1997·Nature

Abstract

Functional imaging studies of people who were blind from an early age have revealed that their primary visual cortex can be activated by Braille reading and other tactile discrimination tasks. Other studies have also shown that visual cortical areas can be activated by somatosensory input in blind subjects but not those with sight. The significance of this cross-modal plasticity is unclear, however, as it is not known whether the visual cortex can process somatosensory information in a functionally relevant way. To address this issue, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation to disrupt the function of different cortical areas in people who were blind from an early age as they identified Braille or embossed Roman letters. Transient stimulation of the occipital (visual) cortex induced errors in both tasks and distorted the tactile perceptions of blind subjects. In contrast, occipital stimulation had no effect on tactile performance in normal-sighted subjects, whereas similar stimulation is known to disrupt their visual performance. We conclude that blindness from an early age can cause the visual cortex to be recruited to a role in somatosensory processing. We propose that this cross-modal plasticity may account in part for the superior tactile perceptual abilities of blind subjects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/38278

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neural disruption of visual cortex with TMS interferes with Braille reading.

    “Additionally, neural disruption of visual cortex with TMS interferes with Braille reading (Cohen et al., 1997; Kupers et al., 2007).”

    From Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1 (2016) · cites this paper as Cohen et al., 1997

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohen, L. G., Celnik, P., Pascual-Leone, A., Corwell, B., Faiz, L., Dambrosia, J., Honda, M., Sadato, N., Gerloff, C., Catala´, M. D., & Hallett, M.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Fukui (JP)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Cohen, Leonardo G.
Venue
Nature
Published
1997-09
Volume
389
Issue
6647
Pages
180-183
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1726527000
Cited by
911
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 37
FWCI
17.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
cross-modal plasticity, early blindness, visual cortex, somatosensory processing, Braille reading, tactile perception, transcranial magnetic stimulation, cortical reorganization, tactile discrimination
MeSH terms
Adult, Blindness, Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory, Female, Humans, Magnetics, Male, Middle Aged, Neuronal Plasticity, Occipital Lobe, Reading, Sensory Aids, Touch, Visual Cortex, Visual Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review