Cited by 18Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesCognitive Functions and Memory

Differential superior prefrontal activity on initial versus subsequent shifts in naive subjects

Konishi, Seiki, Morimoto, Hiroki, Jimura, Koji, Asari, Tomoki, Chikazoe, Junichi, Yamashita, Ken-ichiro, Hirose, Satoshi, Miyashita, Yasushi·2008·NeuroImage

Abstract

Flexible adaptation to changing environments requires shifting of a cognitive set, one basic function of the prefrontal cortex. Set shifting, as instantiated in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (WCST) administered in a neuropsychological testing room, is typically achieved when subjects have no prior experiences of updating one WCST behavior to another. By contrast, earlier neuroimaging studies typically involved examination of repeated transitions between particular behaviors, to which situation subjects are far from naive. Naive subjects with no prior knowledge of the WCST were recruited in the present functional magnetic resonance imaging study to test set shifting under unknown situations that they experienced for the first time. Prominent activation was revealed in the left superior prefrontal cortex selectively on the initial shifts. On the other hand, the inferior prefrontal cortex was significantly activated on both the initial and subsequent shifts. The superior prefrontal activation distinguishable from the conventional inferior prefrontal activation suggests a selective role of this region in performance of the WCST in naive subjects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.037

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The brain regions commonly activated by WCST, ID/ED, and TMT involve fronto-parietal and fronto-striatal areas.

    “As shown in Table 1 (in the main text), regions commonly activated during these tasks are related to fronto-parietal and fronto-striatal brain regions [59–65].”

    From The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism (2009) · cites this paper as [60]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Konishi, S., Morimoto, H., Jimura, K., Asari, T., Chikazoe, J., Yamashita, K.-I., Hirose, S., & Miyashita, Y.
Affiliations
The University of Tokyo (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Konishi, Seiki
  • Miyashita, Yasushi
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
575-580
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1963899272
Cited by
18
References
55
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
set-shifting, inferior prefrontal cortex, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, cognitive flexibility, naive subjects, prefrontal cortex activation
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review