Cited by 244Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Altered cerebellar feedback projections in Asperger syndrome

Abstract

It has been proposed that the biological basis of autism spectrum disorder includes cerebellar 'disconnection'. However, direct in vivo evidence in support of this is lacking. Here, the microstructural integrity of cerebellar white matter in adults with Asperger syndrome was studied using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance tractography. Fifteen adults with Asperger syndrome and 16 age-IQ-gender-matched healthy controls underwent diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. For each subject, tract-specific measurements of mean diffusivity and fractional anisotropy were made within the inferior, middle, superior cerebellar peduncles and short intracerebellar fibres. No group differences were observed in mean diffusivity. However, people with Asperger syndrome had significantly lower fractional anisotropy in the short intracerebellar fibres (p<0.001) and right superior cerebellar (output) peduncle (p<0.001) compared to controls; but no difference in the input tracts. Severity of social impairment, as measured by the Autistic Diagnostic Interview, was negatively correlated with diffusion anisotropy in the fibres of the left superior cerebellar peduncle. These findings suggest a vulnerability of specific cerebellar neural pathways in people with Asperger syndrome. The localised abnormalities in the main cerebellar outflow pathway may prevent the cerebral cortex from receiving those cerebellar feedback inputs necessary for a successful adaptive social behaviour.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.041

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 78 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 244

Metadata

Authors
Catani, M., Jones, D. K., Daly, E., Embiricos, N., Deeley, Q., Pugliese, L., Curran, S., Robertson, D., & Murphy, D. G. M.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
Corresponding author
Catani, Marco
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
1184-1191
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030059540
Cited by
244
References
78
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 18
FWCI
11.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (RP-PG-0606-1045)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
Asperger syndrome, autism spectrum disorder, superior cerebellar peduncle, inferior cerebellar peduncle, middle cerebellar peduncle, fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, social dysfunction, social behavior
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Behavior, Cerebellum, Cognition, Feedback, Humans, Intelligence Tests, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Anisotropy, Asperger Syndrome, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review