CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 95

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Time-course of "off-line" prefrontal rTMS effects - a PET study

Eisenegger, C., Treyer, V., Fehr, E., Knoch, D.·2008·NeuroImage
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.172
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Low-frequency "off-line" repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the course of several minutes has attained considerable attention as a research tool in cognitive neuroscience due to its ability to induce functional disruptions of brain areas. This disruptive rTMS effect is highly valuable for revealing a causal relationship between brain and behavior. However, its influence on remote interconnected areas and, more importantly, the duration of the induced neurophysiological effects, remain unknown. These aspects are critical for a study design in the context of cognitive neuroscience. In order to investigate these issues, 12 healthy male subjects underwent 8 H(2)(15)O positron emission tomography (PET) scans after application of long-train low-frequency rTMS to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Immediately after the stimulation train, regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) increases were present under the stimulation site as well as in other prefrontal cortical areas, including the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) ipsilateral to the stimulation site. The mean increases in rCBF returned to baseline within 9 min. The duration of this unilateral prefrontal rTMS effect on rCBF is of particular interest to those who aim to influence behavior in cognitive paradigms that use an "off-line" approach.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.172

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rTMS parameters used were within currently recommended safety guidelines and were expected to modify DLPFc perfusion for 14 min and reduce excitability of the targeted cortical region for several minutes after the train.

    “The rTMS parameters were well within currently recommended guidelines (Rossi et al., 2009), resulting in an estimated modification of DLPFc perfusion for 14 min (Eisenegger et al., 2008) and in a reduction of excitability of the targeted cortical region for several minutes following completion of the rTMS train (Maeda et al., 2000).”

    From Disrupting the right prefrontal cortex alters moral judgement (2012) · cites this paper as Eisenegger et al., 2008

  • The average duration of responding to all dilemmas (11.3 ± 2.6 min) was shorter than the effect of rTMS stimulation on rDLPFc perfusion demonstrated with the same parameters.

    “Responding to all dilemmas took an average duration of 11.3 Æ 2.6 min, which is shorter than the effect of rTMS stimulation on rDLPFc perfusion demonstrated by Eisenegger and colleagues using the same parameters (single, 15-min, 1-Hz rTMS train, 900 pulses) (Eisenegger et al., 2008).”

    From Disrupting the right prefrontal cortex alters moral judgement (2012) · cites this paper as Eisenegger et al., 2008

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Abler, 2005, Side effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation biased task performance in a cognitive neuroscience study, Brain Topogr., 17, 193, 10.1007/s10548-005-6028-y · DOI
  2. Ackermann, 1984, Increased glucose metabolism during long-duration recurrent inhibition of hippocampal pyramidal cells, J. Neurosci., 4, 251, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-01-00251.1984 · DOI
  3. Brett, 2002, Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox, NeuroImage, 16, 497
  4. Brighina, 2005, Facilitatory effects of 1 Hz rTMS in motor cortex of patients affected by migraine with aura, Exp. Brain Res., 161, 34, 10.1007/s00221-004-2042-7 · DOI
  5. Chouinard, 2003, Modulating neural networks with transcranial magnetic stimulation applied over the dorsal premotor and primary motor cortices, J. Neurophysiol., 90, 1071, 10.1152/jn.01105.2002 · DOI
  6. Critchley, 2000, Cerebral correlates of autonomic cardiovascular arousal: a functional neuroimaging investigation in humans, J. Physiol. 523 Pt, 1, 259, 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00259.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. d'Alfonso, 2000, Laterality effects in selective attention to threat after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation at the prefrontal cortex in female subjects, Neurosci. Lett., 280, 195, 10.1016/S0304-3940(00)00781-3 · DOI
  8. Daskalakis, 2006, The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical inhibition in healthy human subjects, Exp. Brain Res., 174, 403, 10.1007/s00221-006-0472-0 · DOI
  9. Fitzgerald, 2002, The application of transcranial magnetic stimulation in psychiatry and neurosciences research, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 105, 324, 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.1r179.x · DOI
  10. Friston, 1995, Spatial registration and normalisation of images, Hum. Brain Mapp., 2, 165, 10.1002/hbm.460030303 · DOI
  11. Gerschlager, 2001, Decreased corticospinal excitability after subthreshold 1 Hz rTMS over lateral premotor cortex, Neurology, 57, 449, 10.1212/WNL.57.3.449 · DOI
  12. Hallett, 2007, Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a primer, Neuron, 55, 187, 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.026 · DOI
  13. Hilgetag, 2001, Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced ‘virtual lesions’ of human parietal cortex, Nat. Neurosci., 4, 953, 10.1038/nn0901-953 · DOI
  14. Husain, 2002, Simulating transcranial magnetic stimulation during PET with a large-scale neural network model of the prefrontal cortex and the visual system, NeuroImage, 15, 58, 10.1006/nimg.2001.0966 · DOI
  15. Johnson, 2007, The role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in bimodal divided attention: two transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 19, 907, 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.6.907 · DOI
  16. Jueptner, 1995, Review: does measurement of regional cerebral blood flow reflect synaptic activity? Implications for PET and fMRI, NeuroImage, 2, 148, 10.1006/nimg.1995.1017 · DOI
  17. Kimbrell, 2002, Left prefrontal-repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and regional cerebral glucose metabolism in normal volunteers, Psychiatry Res., 115, 101, 10.1016/S0925-4927(02)00041-0 · DOI
  18. Knoch, 2006, Disruption of right prefrontal cortex by low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation induces risk-taking behavior, J. Neurosci., 26, 6469, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0804-06.2006 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Knoch, 2006, Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex, Science, 314, 829, 10.1126/science.1129156 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Knoch, 2006, Lateralized and frequency-dependent effects of prefrontal rTMS on regional cerebral blood flow, NeuroImage, 31, 641, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.025 · DOI
  21. Kosslyn, 1999, The role of area 17 in visual imagery: convergent evidence from PET and rTMS, Science, 284, 167, 10.1126/science.284.5411.167 · DOI
  22. Lewald, 2002, Role of the posterior parietal cortex in spatial hearing, J. Neurosci., 22, RC207, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-03-j0005.2002 · DOI
  23. Maeda, 2000, Modulation of corticospinal excitability by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, Clin. Neurophysiol., 111, 800, 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00323-5 · DOI · Paper page
  24. May, 1998, Experimental cranial pain elicited by capsaicin: a PET study, Pain, 74, 61, 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00144-9 · DOI
  25. Mottaghy, 2002, Segregation of areas related to visual working memory in the prefrontal cortex revealed by rTMS, Cereb. Cortex, 12, 369, 10.1093/cercor/12.4.369 · DOI
  26. Muellbacher, 2000, Effects of low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor excitability and basic motor behavior, Clin. Neurophysiol., 111, 1002, 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00284-4 · DOI
  27. Nahas, 2001, Unilateral left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) produces intensity-dependent bilateral effects as measured by interleaved BOLD fMRI, Biol. Psychiatry, 50, 712, 10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01199-4 · DOI
  28. Ochsner, 2004, For better or for worse: neural systems supporting the cognitive down- and up-regulation of negative emotion, NeuroImage, 23, 483, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.06.030 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Ohnishi, 2004, rCBF changes elicited by rTMS over DLPFC in humans, Suppl. Clin. Neurophysiol., 57, 715, 10.1016/S1567-424X(09)70412-X · DOI
  30. Pascual-Leone, 1998, Study and modulation of human cortical excitability with transcranial magnetic stimulation, J. Clin. Neurophysiol., 15, 333, 10.1097/00004691-199807000-00005 · DOI
  31. Robertson, 2001, The role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during sequence learning is specific for spatial information, Cereb. Cortex, 11, 628, 10.1093/cercor/11.7.628 · DOI
  32. Robertson, 2003, Studies in cognition: the problems solved and created by transcranial magnetic stimulation, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 15, 948, 10.1162/089892903770007344 · DOI
  33. Romero, 2002, Subthreshold low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation selectively decreases facilitation in the motor cortex, Clin. Neurophysiol., 113, 101, 10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00693-9 · DOI
  34. Sack, 2003, Combining transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional imaging in cognitive brain research: possibilities and limitations, Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev., 43, 41, 10.1016/S0165-0173(03)00191-7 · DOI
  35. Sack, 2005, The dynamics of interhemispheric compensatory processes in mental imagery, Science, 308, 702, 10.1126/science.1107784 · DOI
  36. Sack, 2007, Imaging the brain activity changes underlying impaired visuospatial judgments: simultaneous fMRI, TMS, and behavioral studies, Cereb. Cortex, 17, 2841, 10.1093/cercor/bhm013 · DOI
  37. Sakagami, 2007, Functional role of the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex in decision making, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 17, 228, 10.1016/j.conb.2007.02.008 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Speer, 2003, Intensity-dependent regional cerebral blood flow during 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in healthy volunteers studied with H215O positron emission tomography: II. Effects of prefrontal cortex rTMS, Biol. Psychiatry, 54, 826, 10.1016/S0006-3223(03)00324-X · DOI
  39. Walsh, 1999, A primer of magnetic stimulation as a tool for neuropsychology, Neuropsychologia, 37, 125
  40. Wassermann, 1998, Crossed reduction of human motor cortex excitability by 1-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation, Neurosci. Lett., 250, 141, 10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00437-6 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Eisenegger, C., Treyer, V., Fehr, E., & Knoch, D.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-08
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
379-384
ISSN
1053-8119
DOI
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.172
Cited by
95
References
5
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review