Cited by 120Neuroscience and Music PerceptionFetal and Pediatric Neurological DisordersAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Fetal cortical activation to sound at 33 weeks of gestation: A functional MRI study

Jardri, Renaud, Pins, Delphine, Houfflin-Debarge, Véronique, Chaffiotte, Caroline, Rocourt, Nathalie, Pruvo, Jean-Pierre, Steinling, Marc, Delion, Pierre +1 more·2008·NeuroImage

Abstract

Hearing already functions before birth, but little is known about the neural basis of fetal life experiences. Recent imaging studies have validated the use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in pregnant women at 38-weeks of gestation. The aim of the present study was to examine fetal brain activation to sound, using fMRI at the beginning of the third trimester of pregnancy. 6 pregnant women between 28- and 34-weeks of gestation were scanned using a magnetic strength of 1.5 T, with an auditory stimulus applied to their abdomen. 3 fetuses with a gestational age of 33 weeks, showed significant activation to sound in the left temporal lobe, measured using a new data-driven approach (Independent Component Analysis for fMRI time series). Only 2 of these fetuses showed left temporal activation, when the standard voxel-wise analysis method was used (p=0.007; p=0.001). Moreover, motion parameters added as predictors of the General Linear Model confirmed that motion cannot account for the signal variance in the fetal temporal cortex (p=0.01). Comparison between the statistical maps obtained from MRI scans of the fetuses with those obtained from adults, made it possible to confirm our hypothesis, that there is brain activation in the primary auditory cortex in response to sound. Measurement of the fetal hemodynamic response revealed an average fMRI signal change of +3.5%. This study shows that it is possible to use fMRI to detect early fetal brain function, but also confirms that sound processing occurs beyond the reflexive sub-cortical level, at the beginning of the third trimester of pregnancy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.247

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jardri, R., Pins, D., Houfflin-Debarge, V., Chaffiotte, C., Rocourt, N., Pruvo, J.-P., Steinling, M., Delion, P., & Thomas, P.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR)
Corresponding author
Jardri, Renaud
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-08
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
10-18
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030110752
Cited by
120
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
fetal hearing, primary auditory cortex, third trimester, independent component analysis, fetal neuroimaging
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Arousal, Auditory Cortex, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review