Cited by 137Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Watching the fetal brain at ‘rest’

Schöpf, V., Kasprian, G., Brugger, P.C., Prayer, D.·2012·International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has allowed insights into the spatiotemporal distribution of human brain networks. According to the neurophysiological property of the fetal brain to generate spontaneous activity, we aimed to determine the feasibility of investigating the maturation of intrinsic networks, beginning at gestational week 20 in healthy human fetuses by combining resting‐state fMRI and an analytical approach, independent component analysis (ICA). In this study, functional images of 16 fetuses with morphologically normal brain development, from 20 to 36 gestational weeks of age, were acquired on a 1.5 T unit (Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands) using single‐shot, gradient‐recalled echo‐planar imaging. After preprocessing (motion correction, brain extraction), images were analyzed using single‐subject ICA. We visualized a bilateral occipital network and medial and lateral prefrontal activity pattern that involved the future Brodmann areas 9–11. Furthermore, there was one either predominantly right (3/7 cases) or left (4/7 cases) hemispheric lateralized network that involved the superior temporal cortical regions (Brodmann areas 22 and 39). Frequency oscillations were in the range of 0.01–0.06 Hz for all networks. This study shows that resting‐state networks (RSNs) are shaped and are detectable in utero. Further investigations of resting‐state measurements in the fetus may therefore allow developmental brain activity monitoring and may provide insights into early brain function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2011.10.006

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schöpf, V., Kasprian, G., Brugger, P. C., & Prayer, D.
Affiliations
Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Schöpf, V.
Venue
International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-10-26
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
11-17
ISSN
  • 0736-5748 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-474X
OpenAlex
W2025217523
Cited by
137
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Oesterreichische Nationalbank
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
fetal brain, resting-state networks, spontaneous brain activity, fetal brain maturation, independent component analysis, hemispheric lateralization, superior temporal cortex, gestational age
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Fetus, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Prenatal Diagnosis, Rest, Organogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review