Cited by 296Acupuncture Treatment Research StudiesPain Management and Placebo EffectPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Traditional Chinese acupuncture and placebo (sham) acupuncture are differentiated by their effects on μ-opioid receptors (MORs)

Open access
Harris, Richard E., Zubieta, Jon-Kar, Scott, David J., Napadow, Vitaly, Gracely, Richard H., Clauw, Daniel J.·2009·NeuroImage

Abstract

Controversy remains regarding the mechanisms of acupuncture analgesia. A prevailing theory, largely unproven in humans, is that it involves the activation of endogenous opioid antinociceptive systems and mu-opioid receptors (MORs). This is also a neurotransmitter system that mediates the effects of placebo-induced analgesia. This overlap in potential mechanisms may explain the lack of differentiation between traditional acupuncture and either non-traditional or sham acupuncture in multiple controlled clinical trials. We compared both short- and long-term effects of traditional Chinese acupuncture (TA) versus sham acupuncture (SA) treatment on in vivo MOR binding availability in chronic pain patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia (FM). Patients were randomized to receive either TA or SA treatment over the course of 4 weeks. Positron emission tomography (PET) with (11)C-carfentanil was performed once during the first treatment session and then repeated a month later following the eighth treatment. Acupuncture therapy evoked short-term increases in MOR binding potential, in multiple pain and sensory processing regions including the cingulate (dorsal and subgenual), insula, caudate, thalamus, and amygdala. Acupuncture therapy also evoked long-term increases in MOR binding potential in some of the same structures including the cingulate (dorsal and perigenual), caudate, and amygdala. These short- and long-term effects were absent in the sham group where small reductions were observed, an effect more consistent with previous placebo PET studies. Long-term increases in MOR BP following TA were also associated with greater reductions in clinical pain. These findings suggest that divergent MOR processes may mediate clinically relevant analgesic effects for acupuncture and sham acupuncture.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.083

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pain relief produced by placebo, acupuncture, conditioned pain modulation, distraction, and hypnosis is mediated, in part, by endogenous opioidergic systems.

    “Pain relief produced by placebo,2,34,47,67,147 acupuncture,51 conditioned pain modulation,61 distraction,108 and hypnosis39,110 is meditated, in part, by endogenous opioidergic systems.”
  • Analgesia from placebo, conditioned pain modulation, acupuncture, hypnosis, and attentional control is mediated by endogenous opioid mechanisms.

    “Endogenous opioidergic mechanisms have been repeatedly demonstrated to mediate analgesia produced by placebo,89–93 conditioned pain modulation,94 acupuncture,95 hypnosis,96 and attentional control.97”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harris, R. E., Zubieta, J.-K., Scott, D. J., Napadow, V., Gracely, R. H., & Clauw, D. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Omneuron (United States) (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Harris, Richard E.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
1077-1085
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156343006
Cited by
296
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 31
FWCI
61.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000042)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (K01-AT-01111-01, R01AT001415, K01AT001111, K01AT002166, P01AT002048)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
traditional Chinese acupuncture, sham acupuncture, mu-opioid receptor, opioid receptor binding, placebo analgesia, fibromyalgia, chronic pain, cingulate cortex, insula, amygdala, caudate nucleus, thalamus
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Chronic Disease, Female, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Pain, Placebos, Acupuncture Analgesia, Placebo Effect, Receptors, Opioid, mu, Positron-Emission Tomography, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review