Cited by 337Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesBayesian Modeling and Causal InferenceAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Six problems for causal inference from fMRI

Open access
Ramsey, J.D., Hanson, S.J., Hanson, C., Halchenko, Y.O., Poldrack, R.A., Glymour, C.·2010·NeuroImage

Abstract

Neuroimaging (e.g. fMRI) data are increasingly used to attempt to identify not only brain regions of interest (ROIs) that are especially active during perception, cognition, and action, but also the qualitative causal relations among activity in these regions (known as effective connectivity; Friston, 1994). Previous investigations and anatomical and physiological knowledge may somewhat constrain the possible hypotheses, but there often remains a vast space of possible causal structures. To find actual effective connectivity relations, search methods must accommodate indirect measurements of nonlinear time series dependencies, feedback, multiple subjects possibly varying in identified regions of interest, and unknown possible location-dependent variations in BOLD response delays. We describe combinations of procedures that under these conditions find feed-forward sub-structure characteristic of a group of subjects. The method is illustrated with an empirical data set and confirmed with simulations of time series of non-linear, randomly generated, effective connectivities, with feedback, subject to random differences of BOLD delays, with regions of interest missing at random for some subjects, measured with noise approximating the signal to noise ratio of the empirical data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.065

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bayes nets model the full set of covariances or conditional dependencies between all nodes' timeseries and show some promise.

    “Bayes nets model the full set of covariances (or conditional dependencies) between all nodes’ timeseries [59] and show some promise.”

    From Functional connectomics from resting-state fMRI (2013) · cites this paper as [59]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lacerda, G., Spirtes, P., Ramsey, J., Hoyer, P.O., 2008. Discovering cyclic causal models by independent components analysis. Proceedings of the 24th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. AUAI Press, Oregon.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramsey, J. D., Hanson, S. J., Hanson, C., Halchenko, Y. O., Poldrack, R. A., & Glymour, C.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (US)
Corresponding author
Ramsey, J.D.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
1545-1558
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109198067
Cited by
337
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 23
FWCI
9.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
James S. McDonnell Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
effective connectivity, causal inference, functional MRI, nonlinear time series, feedback, search strategies
MeSH terms
Brain, Computer Simulation, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Models, Neurological, Oxygen, Time Factors, Nonlinear Dynamics, Databases as Topic, Feedback, Physiological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review