The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The pairwise phase consistency: A bias-free measure of rhythmic neuronal synchronization
Abstract
Oscillatory activity is a widespread phenomenon in nervous systems and has been implicated in numerous functions. Signals that are generated by two separate neuronal sources often demonstrate a consistent phase-relationship in a particular frequency-band, i.e., they demonstrate rhythmic neuronal synchronization. This consistency is conventionally measured by the PLV (phase-locking value) or the spectral coherence measure. Both statistical measures suffer from significant bias, in that their sample estimates overestimate the population statistics for finite sample sizes. This is a significant problem in the neurosciences where statistical comparisons are often made between conditions with a different number of trials or between neurons with a different number of spikes. We introduce a new circular statistic, the PPC (pairwise phase consistency). We demonstrate that the sample estimate of the PPC is a bias-free and consistent estimator of its corresponding population parameter. We show, both analytically and by means of numerical simulations, that the population statistic of the PPC is equivalent to the population statistic of the squared PLV. The variance and mean squared error of the PPC and PLV are compared. Finally, we demonstrate the practical relevance of the method in actual neuronal data recorded from the orbitofrontal cortex of rats that engage in a two-odour discrimination task. We find a strong increase in rhythmic synchronization of spikes relative to the local field potential (as measured by the PPC) for a wide range of low frequencies (including the theta-band) during the anticipation of sucrose delivery in comparison to the anticipation of quinine delivery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks
Buzsáki, G., & Draguhn, A. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099745 · Cited by 6,576
The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration
Varela, F., Lachaux, J.-P., Rodriguez, E., & Martinerie, J. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35067550 · Cited by 4,761
A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence.
Fries, P. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.011 · Cited by 4,284
Self-citationGray, C. M., König, P., Engel, A. K., & Singer, W. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/338334a0 · Cited by 4,183
Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals
Lachaux, J.-P., Rodriguez, E., Martinerie, J., & Varela, F. J. (1999) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(1999)8:4<194::aid-hbm4>3.0.co;2-c · Cited by 3,798
Visual Feature Integration and the Temporal Correlation Hypothesis
Singer, W., & Gray, C. M. (1995) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.003011 · Cited by 3,123
Phase relationship between hippocampal place units and the EEG theta rhythm
O'Keefe, J., & Recce, M. L. (1993) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.450030307 · Cited by 2,552
Statistical Analysis of Circular Data.
Lange, N., & Fisher, N. I. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2291098 · Cited by 2,146
Neuronal gamma-band synchronization as a fundamental process in cortical computation
Fries, P. (2009) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135603 · Cited by 1,713
Self-citationModulation of Neuronal Interactions Through Neuronal Synchronization
Womelsdorf, T., Schoffelen, J.-M., Oostenveld, R., Singer, W., Desimone, R., Engel, A. K., & Fries, P. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1139597 · Cited by 1,367
Self-citation
Cited by
Vinck, M., Oostenveld, R., van Wingerden, M., Battaglia, F., & Pennartz, C. M. A. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.055 · Cited by 1,753
Self-citationA Tutorial Review of Functional Connectivity Analysis Methods and Their Interpretational Pitfalls
Bastos, A. M., & Schoffelen, J.-M. (2016) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2015.00175 · Cited by 1,313
Hippocampal–prefrontal input supports spatial encoding in working memory
Spellman, T., Rigotti, M., Ahmari, S. E., Fusi, S., Gogos, J. A., & Gordon, J. A. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14445 · Cited by 693
A 4 Hz oscillation adaptively synchronizes prefrontal, VTA, and hippocampal activities
Fujisawa, S., & Buzsáki, G. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.08.018 · Cited by 501
“…by the significantly lower firing rate of nonpredicting neurons in the central arm because the phase-modulation differences persisted after equalizing the spike numbers of all predicting and nonpredicting neurons for the analysis, using exhaustive bootstrapping (Vinck et al., 2010; Figure S6).”
InfluentialPadilla-Coreano, N., Bolkan, S. S., Pierce, G. M., Blackman, D. R., Hardin, W. D., Garcia-Garcia, A. L., Spellman, T. J., & Gordon, J. A. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.01.011 · Cited by 463
Metadata
- Authors
- Vinck, M., van Wingerden, M., Womelsdorf, T., Fries, P., & Pennartz, C. M. A.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 112-122
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2124405419
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 5.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The pairwise phase consistency: A bias-free measure of rhythmic neuronal synchronization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.073
- The paper
- Vinck, M., van Wingerden, M., Womelsdorf, T., Fries, P., & Pennartz, C. M. A. (2010). The pairwise phase consistency: A bias-free measure of rhythmic neuronal synchronization. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.073
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.