Cited by 153Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFree Will and AgencyEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Rostral cingulate zone and correct response monitoring: ICA and source localization evidences for the unicity of correct- and error-negativities

Open access
Roger, Clémence, Bénar, Christian G., Vidal, Franck, Hasbroucq, Thierry, Burle, Borís·2010·NeuroImage

Abstract

Falkenstein et al. (1991) first described a negative wave occurring just after an erroneous response in choice Reaction time tasks ("Error Negativity"-Ne or "Error Related Negativity"-ERN). Thanks to Laplacian transform of the data, Vidal et al. (2000, 2003a) described a wave on correct trials with similar topography and latency, although of smaller amplitude compared to the errors. A critical question is whether the Ne observed on errors and the negativity reported on correct trials reflect the same (modulated) activity, or whether they reflect completely different mechanisms. These two alternative possibilities were tested thanks to Independent Component Analysis (ICA) and source localization. ICA results showed that the waves recorded on errors and correct trials can be accounted for by the same independent component, corresponding to a dipolar source located within the Rostral Cingulate Zone. Source localization on the raw data also confirmed a common generator for correct and error trials. These data suggest that the waves on errors and correct trials reflect the same brain activity, whose amplitude varies as a function of the correctness of the response. The implications of this result for cognitive control are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.005

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roger, C., Bénar, C. G., Vidal, F., Hasbroucq, T., & Burle, B.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
391-403
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014088563
Cited by
153
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 11
FWCI
9.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Research Council under the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
error-related negativity, correct response negativity, response monitoring, error detection, cognitive control, choice reaction time, independent component analysis, source localization, dipolar sources, event-related potentials
MeSH terms
Adult, Electroencephalography, Electromyography, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Motor Activity, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Time Factors, Young Adult, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review