Cited by 330Forgiveness and Related BehaviorsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAction Observation and Synchronization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Investigating the functional anatomy of empathy and forgiveness

Abstract

Previous functional brain imaging studies suggest that the ability to infer the intentions and mental states of others (social cognition) is mediated by medial prefrontal cortex. Little is known about the anatomy of empathy and forgiveness. We used functional MRI to detect brain regions engaged by judging others' emotional states and the forgivability of their crimes. Ten volunteers read and made judgements based on social scenarios and a high level baseline task (social reasoning). Both empathic and forgivability judgements activated left superior frontal gyrus, orbitofrontal gyrus and precuneus. Empathic judgements also activated left anterior middle temporal and left inferior frontal gyri, while forgivability judgements activated posterior cingulate gyrus. Empathic and forgivability judgements activate specific regions of the human brain, which we propose contribute to social cohesion.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001756-200108080-00029

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gratitude and forgiveness require distinct attributions but share a common, fundamental component of empathy.

    “Gratitude and forgiveness require distinct attributions (Fincham, Paleari, & Regalia, 2002; McCullough, Emmons, & Tsang, 2002) but share a common, fundamental component of empathy (Farrow et al., 2001; Lazarus, 1991; Macaskill, Maltby, & Day, 2002; McCullough, Kilpatrick, Emmons, & Larson, 2001).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Vogt, 1992, Cerebr Cortex, 2, 435

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Farrow, T. F. D., Zheng, Y., Wilkinson, I. D., Spence, S. A., Deakin, J. F. W., Tarrier, N., Griffiths, P. D., & Woodruff, P. W. R.
Affiliations
Northern General Hospital (GB)
Venue
Neuroreport
Published
2001-08
Volume
12
Issue
11
Pages
2433-2438
ISSN
0959-4965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976949933
Cited by
330
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 18
FWCI
19.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroreport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
empathy, forgiveness, social cognition, mental state inference, medial prefrontal cortex, superior frontal gyrus, orbitofrontal cortex, precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex, social cohesion, moral judgment, brain regions
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Empathy, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Temporal Lobe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review